Literature DB >> 26417701

Variability in quality of chest compressions provided during simulated cardiac arrest across nine pediatric institutions.

Adam Cheng1, Elizabeth A Hunt2, David Grant3, Yiqun Lin4, Vincent Grant5, Jonathan P Duff6, Marjorie Lee White7, Dawn Taylor Peterson8, John Zhong9, Ronald Gottesman10, Stephanie Sudikoff11, Quynh Doan12, Vinay M Nadkarni13, Linda Brown, Frank Overly, Ilana Bank, Farhan Bhanji, David Kessler, Nancy Tofil, Jennifer Davidson, Mark Adler, Alex Bragg, Kimberly Marohn, Nicola Robertson, Jordan Duval-Arnould, Hubert Wong, Aaron Donoghue, Jenny Chatfield, Nnenna Chime.   

Abstract

AIM: The variability in quality of CPR provided during cardiac arrest across pediatric institutions is unknown. We aimed to describe the degree of variability in the quality of CPR across 9 pediatric institutions, and determine if variability across sites would be affected by Just-in-Time CPR training and/or visual feedback during simulated cardiac arrest.
METHODS: We conducted secondary analyses of data collected from a prospective, multi-center trial. Participants were equally randomized to either: (1) No intervention; (2) Real-time CPR visual feedback during cardiac arrest or (3) Just-in-Time CPR training. We report the variability in median chest compression depth and rate across institutions, and the variability in the proportion of 30-s epochs of CPR meeting 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for depth and rate.
RESULTS: We analyzed data from 528 epochs in the no intervention group, 552 epochs in the visual feedback group, and 525 epochs in the JIT training group. In the no intervention group, compression depth (median range 22.2-39.2mm) and rate (median range 116.0-147.6 min(-1)) demonstrated significant variability between study sites (p<0.001). The proportion of compressions with adequate depth (0-11.5%) and rate (0-60.5%) also varied significantly across sites (p<0.001). The variability in compression depth and rate persisted despite use of real-time visual feedback or JIT training (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The quality of CPR across multiple pediatric institutions is variable. Variability in CPR quality across institutions persists even with the implementation of a Just-in-Time training session and visual feedback for CPR quality during simulated cardiac arrest.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Chest compressions; Pediatric; Quality; Registration ID: NCT02075450; Resuscitation; Variability; www.clinicaltrials.gov

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26417701     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  7 in total

1.  Continuous capnography monitoring during resuscitation in a transitional large mammalian model of asphyxial cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Praveen Chandrasekharan; Payam Vali; Munmun Rawat; Bobby Mathew; Sylvia F Gugino; Carmon Koenigsknecht; Justin Helman; Jayasree Nair; Sara Berkelhamer; Satyan Lakshminrusimha
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Using clinical simulation to study how to improve quality and safety in healthcare.

Authors:  Guillaume Lamé; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2018-09-29

3.  Comparison between manual and mechanical chest compressions during resuscitation in a pediatric animal model of asphyxial cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jorge López; Sarah N Fernández; Rafael González; María J Solana; Javier Urbano; Blanca Toledo; Jesús López-Herce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Reducing the impact of intensive care unit mattress compressibility during CPR: a simulation-based study.

Authors:  Yiqun Lin; Brandi Wan; Claudia Belanger; Kent Hecker; Elaine Gilfoyle; Jennifer Davidson; Adam Cheng
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2017-11-16

5.  Conducting multicenter research in healthcare simulation: Lessons learned from the INSPIRE network.

Authors:  Adam Cheng; David Kessler; Ralph Mackinnon; Todd P Chang; Vinay M Nadkarni; Elizabeth A Hunt; Jordan Duval-Arnould; Yiqun Lin; Martin Pusic; Marc Auerbach
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-28

6.  Development and Usability of a Novel Interactive Tablet App (PediAppRREST) to Support the Management of Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: Pilot High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Study.

Authors:  Francesco Corazza; Deborah Snijders; Marta Arpone; Valentina Stritoni; Francesco Martinolli; Marco Daverio; Maria Giulia Losi; Luca Soldi; Francesco Tesauri; Liviana Da Dalt; Silvia Bressan
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  Consistency and variability in human performance during simulate infant CPR: a reliability study.

Authors:  Debora Almeida; Carol Clark; Michael Jones; Phillip McConnell; Jonathan Williams
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.953

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.