| Literature DB >> 26417542 |
Anne M Spain1, Mostafa S Elshahed2, Fares Z Najar3, Lee R Krumholz4.
Abstract
Zodletone spring is a sulfide-rich spring in southwestern Oklahoma characterized by shallow, microoxic, light-exposed spring water overlaying anoxic sediments. Previously, culture-independent 16S rRNA gene based diversity surveys have revealed that Zodletone spring source sediments harbor a highly diverse microbial community, with multiple lineages putatively involved in various sulfur-cycling processes. Here, we conducted a metatranscriptomic survey of microbial populations in Zodletone spring source sediments to characterize the relative prevalence and importance of putative phototrophic, chemolithotrophic, and heterotrophic microorganisms in the sulfur cycle, the identity of lineages actively involved in various sulfur cycling processes, and the interaction between sulfur cycling and other geochemical processes at the spring source. Sediment samples at the spring's source were taken at three different times within a 24-h period for geochemical analyses and RNA sequencing. In depth mining of datasets for sulfur cycling transcripts revealed major sulfur cycling pathways and taxa involved, including an unexpected potential role of Actinobacteria in sulfide oxidation and thiosulfate transformation. Surprisingly, transcripts coding for the cyanobacterial Photosystem II D1 protein, methane monooxygenase, and terminal cytochrome oxidases were encountered, indicating that genes for oxygen production and aerobic modes of metabolism are actively being transcribed, despite below-detectable levels (<1 µM) of oxygen in source sediment. Results highlight transcripts involved in sulfur, methane, and oxygen cycles, propose that oxygenic photosynthesis could support aerobic methane and sulfide oxidation in anoxic sediments exposed to sunlight, and provide a viewpoint of microbial metabolic lifestyles under conditions similar to those seen during late Archaean and Proterozoic eons.Entities:
Keywords: Actinobacteria; Biodiversity; Metatranscriptomics; Methane oxidation; Microbial mats; Oxygenic photosynthesis; Sulfide oxidation; Sulfur cycle; Sulfur spring
Year: 2015 PMID: 26417542 PMCID: PMC4582958 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Geochemistry of Zodletone spring’s source water.
Geochemistry of Zodletone source water over the time course of the experiment is shown at the top (A). Dashed lines indicate an extrapolation of the data from the 07:30 (early morning) time point. Dotted vertical lines indicate sunset and sunrise on day(s) of sampling. Above: triangles and diamonds indicate sulfide concentrations and pH values, respectively. Below: squares, stars, and circles indicate thiosulfate (S2O32−), sulfite (SO32−), and sulfate (SO42−) concentrations, respectively. Y-error bars represent the standard deviation of duplicate measurements for sulfate and triplicate measurements for thiosulfate. Sulfite, pH, and sulfide values were based on single measurements only. Source water was sampled again in August 2014 to measure pH and sulfide in triplicate and verify patterns of sulfide loss and generation during the day and night, respectively (B).
Total pyrosequencing dataset statistics, including statistics for potential mRNA transcripts data subsets.
| Full dataset stats | Statistics for subsets of potential mRNA transcripts | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample/time of day | Total no. of reads | Avg. read length (bp) | No. of potential mRNA reads (% of total) | No. of potential mRNA reads with no significant BLASTX alignments (%) | No. of potential mRNA reads functionally annotated into MG-RAST subsystems (%) | % potential mRNA reads taxonomically unclassified |
| 22:15 | 297,646 | 427 | 34,835 (11.7%) | 15,935 (45.7%) | 7,730 (22.2%) | 10.2% |
| 07:30 | 301,933 | 412 | 53,381 (17.7%) | 26,079 (48.9%) | 14,212 (26.6%) | 10.4% |
| 12:15 | 324,282 | 402 | 35,643 (11.0%) | 15,938 (44.7%) | 8,945 (25.1%) | 13.4% |
| 12:15 (total RNA control) | 198,212 | 344 | 10,035 (5.1%) | – | – | – |
Notes.
Unassigned at the phylum-level and includes the sum of all potential mRNA reads assigned by MEGAN 4.0 as Unassigned Bacteria, Unassigned Archaea, and Unassigned Cellular Organisms.
Figure 2Taxonomic distribution of bacterial and archaeal mRNA transcripts in Zodletone sediment samples.
Values are based on relative abundance of transcripts associated with each phylum, as determined using MEGAN 4.0, at three different time points: 22:15 (n = 34,835 reads), 07:30 (n = 53,381 reads), and 12:15 (n = 35,643 reads). Pie chart sizes are proportional to the overall relative abundance of each taxon. Relative abundance values representing the proportion of potential mRNA transcripts that yielded no significant BLASTX alignments for each time point are not shown. Specific relative abundance values for mRNA transcripts mapping to different taxa at the phylum-, class-, and order-levels are reported for each sample in Table S3.
Figure 3Functional classification and distribution of mRNA transcripts from Zodletone sediment samples.
The heatmap (A) shows a functional-based clustering of samples based on transcript annotations into MG-Rast (v2) subsystem categories. The bar graph (B) shows the most abundant metabolic subsystems identified from Zodletone source metatranscriptomes at night (blue bars), in the early morning (green bars), and in the afternoon (pink bars).
Figure 4Relative abundance and taxonomic composition of mRNA transcripts involved in O2 production and utilization.
Rel. abundance values shown are the % of potential mRNA transcripts from each sample, 22:15 (top of ea. box). 07:30 (middle), and 12:15 (bottom). The color scale ranks each gene from least abundant (green) to most abundant (red).
Figure 5Relative abundance and taxonomic composition of sulfur cycling transcripts.
Rel. abundance values shown are the % of total potential mRNA transcripts from each sample, 22:15 (top of ea. box). 07:30 (middle), and 12:15 (bottom). The color scale ranks each gene from least abundant (green) to most abundant (red). A full list of gene names categorized in each pathway can be found below Table 2.
Distribution of the percentage of transcripts in each S cycling category, or collection of related pathways, that remained unclassified at the phylum-level.
| Sample/time point | No. S cycling reads | % of S cycling reads unclassified | % unclassified (phylum-level) in each S-cycling pathway | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic S metabolism | Inorganic S assimilation | Reduction | Oxidation | Disproportionation | Transport | |||
| 22:15 | 94 | 41.5 | 45.2 | 62.5 | 27.8 | 27.8 | 61.5 | 33.3 |
| 07:30 | 114 | 31.6 | 43.8 | 100.0 | 26.5 | 20.8 | 22.2 | 18.2 |
| 12:15 | 160 | 34.4 | 25.5 | 75.0 | 64.3 | 27.3 | 23.8 | 28.6 |
| Average | 35.8 | 38.1 | 79.2 | 39.5 | 25.3 | 35.9 | 26.7 | |
| StDev | 5.1 | 11.0 | 19.1 | 21.5 | 3.9 | 22.3 | 7.7 | |
Notes.
Organic S metabolisms pathways (and genes) include: alkanesulfonate utilization (alkanesulfonates binding protein); Organosulfatases (sulfatase); Taurine utilization (Gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase, Taurine transport protein TauB, Taurine-pyruvate aminotransferase, and Taurine dioxygenase TauD); glutathione utilization (putative glutathione transporter).
Inorganic S assimilation pathways (and genes) include: inorganic S assimilation (3’(2’)5’-bisphosphate nucleotidase); sulfate activation to APS (assimilatory-type sulfate adenylyltransferase); APS activation for sulfonation (APS kinase); assimilatory sulfate reduction (assimilatory-type sulfite reductase).
Reduction pathways (and genes) include: DMSO degradation (DMSO reductase); dissimilatory sulfate reduction (dissimilatory-type sulfate adenylyltransferase, APS reductase, dissimilatory sulfite reductase); sulfur reduction I (H2:sulfur or NADH:sulfur oxidoreductase); Sulfur reduction II (polysulfide reductase), and tetrathionate reduction (tetrathionate reductase).
Oxidation pathways (and genes) include: sulfide oxidation I (sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase); sulfide oxidation II (flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase); sulfide oxidation III (reverse-type sulfite reductase); sulfite oxidation I (sulfite:cytochrome c oxidoreductase); sulfite oxidation II (reverse-type APS reductase), sulfite oxidation III (sulfite oxidase); possible sulfur/polysulfide oxidation (NADH oxidase/NADH:polysulfide oxidoreductase); thiosulfate/sulfur oxidation/Sox operon (SoxA, SoxB, SoxC, SoxD, SoxH, SoxX, SoxY).
Disproportionation pathways (and genes) include: thiosulfate disproportionation I,II, or III (rhodanese-like sulfurtransferase), thiosulfate disproportionation I or II (thiosulfate reductase); thiosulfate disproportionation II/cyanate pathway (rhodanese, cyanate hydratase).
Transport genes include: ABC-type nitrate/sulfonate/bicarbonate transporter; sulfate & thiosulfate binding protein CysP; sulfate & thiosulfate import protein CysA; sulfate & thiosulfate permease protein CysT; sulfate permease; Trk-type sulfate permease; sulfate transporter CysZ.