| Literature DB >> 26417480 |
Sunita Athavale1, Sheetal Kotgirwar1, Rekha Lalwani1.
Abstract
During the strengthening and weakening procedures of intraocular muscles, distance of insertion from the sclerocorneal junction is an important determinant in the identification of muscles. During repositioning of the aponeurosis of the muscles, it is desired that the width should not change in order to avoid diversion of forces. Available anatomic studies on insertions of extraocular muscles are few, date back to early twentieth century and have been conducted on mostly white population. The present study is an attempt to document the insertions of recti and oblique muscles in Indian population. Forty eyeballs were removed from orbit. Insertion of recti and obliqui were cleaned and eyeballs were perfused with normal saline to regain the volume (hence shape and size) before recording observations. Insertion of recti and obliqui muscles were observed under various study parameters. The distance of insertion of recti from the limbus were found to be 7.3 mm, 8.06 mm, 8.71 mm, and 8.74 mm for medial, inferior, lateral, and superior rectus, respectively. The superior oblique was aponeurotic and found to be more variable in mode of insertion as compared to inferior oblique which had a fleshy and relatively constant insertion. The observations on insertion of recti and obliqui as obtained in present study differ from earlier studies to the tune of 1-1.5 mm. This may be attributed to adoption of method of reperfusion of eyeball before recording observations thus maintaining size close to in vivo. The observations are expected to be closer to actual.Entities:
Keywords: Aponurosis; Insertion; Muscle; Squint; Surgery
Year: 2015 PMID: 26417480 PMCID: PMC4582163 DOI: 10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anat Cell Biol ISSN: 2093-3665
Fig. 1Showing insertions of rectus muscles and various study parameters. a1, a2, a3, and a4 represent distance of insertion from limbus of SR, MR, IR, and LR, respectively. b1, b2, b3, and b4 represents width of insertions of SR, MR, IR, and LR, respectively. c1, c2, c3, and c4 represent distance between adjacent recti, respectively. MR, medial rectus; IR, inferior rectus; LR, lateral rectus; SR, superior rectus.
Descriptive statistics of various study parameters of the rectus muscles
| Variable | Distance of insertion from limbus (mm) | Width of insertion (mm) | Distance between insertions of adjacent recti (mm) | Length of aponeurosis (mm) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MR | IR | LR | SR | MR | IR | LR | SR | MR-IR | IR-LR | LR-SR | SR-MR | MR | IR | LR | SR | |
| Average | 7.34 | 8.06 | 8.71 | 8.74 | 9.6 | 8.72 | 8.9 | 9.11 | 7.6 | 8 | 8.07 | 8.85 | 2.99 | 4 | 7.90 | 4.41 |
| Standard deviation | 0.78 | 1.03 | 1.27 | 0.83 | 1.12 | 1.28 | 1.15 | 1.05 | 1.88 | 1.36 | 1.36 | 1.04 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.15 | 1.17 |
| Maximum | 10.85 | 10.85 | 10.7 | 10.9 | 11.41 | 10.01 | 11.6 | 11.89 | 9.87 | 10.83 | 10.76 | 10.73 | 6.47 | 7 | 10.72 | 8.39 |
| Minimum | 6.21 | 6.6 | 6.94 | 7.09 | 7.32 | 6.14 | 6.8 | 7.25 | 5.56 | 5.15 | 6.13 | 5.75 | 1.22 | 2 | 5.2 | 2.38 |
Difference between right and left sides was statistically not significant. MR, medial rectus; IR, inferior rectus; LR, lateral rectus; SR, superior rectus.
Descriptive statistics of various study parameters of the oblique muscles
| Variable | Width of insertion of SO (mm) | Width of insertion of IO (mm) | Minimum distance between insertions of SO and IO (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average | 8.38 | 7.9 | 13.79 |
| Standard deviation | 1.68 | 0.95 | 1.8 |
| Maximum | 12.47 | 9.85 | 17.48 |
| Minimum | 4.72 | 5.44 | 8.97 |
Difference between right and left sides was statistically not significant. SO, superior oblique; IO, inferior oblique.
Fig. 2Shows different pattern of insertion of SO with respect to SR. SO, superior oblique; SR, superior rectus; L, lateral; M, medial.
The comparisons of various study parameters between present and other studies
| Variable | Distance of insertion of recti from limbus (mm) | Width of insertion of recti from limbus (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apt (1980) [ | Other studiesa) | Present study | Apt (1980) [ | Other studiesb) | Present study | |
| MR | 3.3-6.4 | 5.05-5.7 | 6.21-10.85 | 9.6-13.3 | 10.30-10.76 | 7.32-11.41 |
| IR | 3.9-7.6 | 6.4-6.85 | 6.94-10.7 | 8.8-12.8 | 9.8-10.35 | 6.41-10.01 |
| LR | 4.8-7.9 | 6.6-7.4 | 6.94-10.7 | 8.8-12.5 | 9.2-9.65 | 6.8-11.6 |
| SR | 5.0-8.0 | 7.1-8.01 | 7.09-10.9 | 9.8-14.0 | 10.02-10.75 | 7.25-11.89 |
MR, medial rectus; IR, inferior rectus; LR, lateral rectus; SR, superior rectus. a)Fuchs (1884), Weiss (1897), Howe (1902), and Gat (1947) as quoted by Apt (1980) [5]. b)Fuchs (1884), Weiss (1897), Fink (1947) as quoted by Apt (1980) [5].
The comparisons of distance (mm) between insertions of adjacent recti between present and Apt (1980) [5]
| Distance between adjacent recti | Present study | Apt (1980) [ | Other studiesa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR-IR | 5.56-9.87 | 4.5-8.9 | 5.5 |
| IR-LR | 5.15-10.83 | 4.1-9.6 | 7.0-9.0 |
| LR-SR | 6.13-10.76 | 5.0-9.6 | 6.5-8.0 |
| SR-MR | 5.57-10.73 | 5.6-9.5 | 7.0-8.0 |
MR, medial rectus; IR, inferior rectus; LR, lateral rectus; SR, superior rectus. a)Duke-Elder and Wybar (1961) and Renard et al. (1965) as quoted by Apt (1980) [5].