| Literature DB >> 26417353 |
Inés Hammami1, Slim Smaoui2, Anis Ben Hsouna3, Naceur Hamdi4, Mohamed Ali Triki1.
Abstract
The aims of this study were to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of the leaf essential oil and the leaf extracts of R. montana against Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, Verticillium dahliae, Aspergillus oryzae and Fusarium solani. The oil (1.000 µg/disk) and the extracts (1.500 µg/disk) revealed a remarkable antifungal effect against the tested plant pathogenic fungi with a radial growth inhibition percentage of 40.0-80.0 % and 5.0-58.0 %, respectively along with their respective MIC values ranging from 100 to 1100 µg/mL and 250 to 3000 µg/mL. The oil had a strong detrimental effect on spore germination of all the tested plant pathogens along with the concentration as well as time-dependent kinetic inhibition of Fusarium oxysporum. Also, the oil exhibited a potent in vivo antifungal effect against Botrytis cinerea on tomato plants. Experiments carried out in plant revealed that the essential oil was slightly effective in suppression of gall formation induced by Agrobacterium tumefaciens on bitter almond. The results of this study indicate that the oil and extracts of R. montana leaves could become natural alternatives to synthetic fungicides to control certain important plant microbial diseases. The GC-MS analysis determined that 28 compounds, which represented 89.03 % of total oil, were present in the oil containing mainly 1-butene, methylcyclopropane, 2-butene and caryophyllene oxide.Entities:
Keywords: Ruta montana; antibacterial activity; antifungal activity; essential oil; in vivo assay
Year: 2015 PMID: 26417353 PMCID: PMC4553861 DOI: 10.17179/excli2014-655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EXCLI J ISSN: 1611-2156 Impact factor: 4.068
Figure 1Minimum inhibitory concentration of the leaf essential oil of R. montana against plant pathogenic fungi. Each experiment was performed three times and the data averaged (n = 3). Numbers followed by different letters (a-f) are significantly different at the level of P<0.05 according to the Duncan’s multiple range tests. Benomyl was used as positive control for each pathogen.
Figure 2Minimum inhibitory concentration of the leaf extracts of R. montana against plant pathogenic fungi. MLE methanol leaf extract, ELE ethyl acetate leaf extract, CLE chloroform leaf extract, HLE hexane leaf extract. Each experiment was performed three times and the data averaged (n = 3). Numbers followed by different letters (a–k) are significantly different at the level of P < 0.05 according to the Duncan’s multiple range tests.
Table 1Effect of different concentrations (µg/mL) of the leaf essential oil of R. montana on spore germination of tested fungi.
Figure 3Kinetics of inhibition of F. oxysporum spores by the different concentrations of the leaf essential oil of R. montana. Each experiment was performed three times and the data averaged (n = 3). Numbers followed by different letters (a–f) are significantly different at the level of P < 0.05 according to the Duncan’s multiple range test.
Table 2In vivo antifungal activity of leaf essential oil of R. montana against the plant pathogenic fungi B. cinerea on tomato plants
Table 3Chemical composition of volatile oil isolated by hydrodistillation from R. montana