Literature DB >> 26417062

Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery and conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective comparative study of perioperative clinical outcomes†.

Kyoji Hirai1, Shingo Takeuchi2, Jitsuo Usuda3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility, safety and postoperative wound pain of single-incision thoracoscopic surgery (SITS) for Stage I lung cancer in patients who had previously undergone surgery compared with conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (c-VATS).
METHODS: Lobectomy by SITS (60) and c-VATS (20) was performed for Stage I lung cancer between 2011 and 2014. In SITS, an ∼ 5-cm small incision was placed at the fourth or fifth intercostal space from the anterior to posterior axillary line. C-VATS was performed via three or four ports using trocars only. The evaluation items were general operative outcomes, pain stress using the Numeric Rating scale (NRS) on postoperative days 3, 7 and 30, and some pathological symptoms related to the neuropathic wound pain through the operative course. The number of days of use of analgesic agents was also evaluated for 1 month after surgery.
RESULTS: SITS showed similar perioperative outcomes (postoperative hospital stay, blood loss, surgical time, drainage duration, creatine phosphokinase (CPKmax), creactive protein (CRPmax) and frequency of postoperative complications) to those of c-VATS. Additionally, the average NRS in SITS decreased on postoperative days 7 and 30 (Day 7: 2.4 ± 0.4 vs 4.2 ± 0.3, P = 0.041, Day 30: 1.7 ± 0.4 vs 3.3 ± 0.3, P = 0.038) and the number of days analgesic agents were administered was also reduced (SITS: 8.1 ± 0.9 vs c-VATS 13.1 ± 1.2 days, P = 0.045). The frequency of allodynia, hyperalgesia, hypaesthesia and numbness was significantly reduced in the SITS group.
CONCLUSIONS: Although conclusive evidence has not yet been obtained, SITS is more minimally invasive in regard to postoperative wound pain compared with c-VATS. This procedure should be considered as a treatment option for early-stage lung cancer.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung cancer; Minimally invasive; Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26417062     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  42 in total

1.  Uniportal and three-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: analysis of the Italian video-assisted thoracic surgery group database.

Authors:  Davide Tosi; Mario Nosotti; Gianluca Bonitta; Alessandra Mazzucco; Ilaria Righi; Paolo Mendogni; Lorenzo Rosso; Alessandro Palleschi; Gaetano Rocco; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-11-01

Review 2.  Minimally invasive thoracic surgery: beyond surgical access.

Authors:  Max K H Wong; Alva K Y Sit; Timmy W K Au
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Single port VATS: recent developments in Asia.

Authors:  Peter S Y Yu; Freddie Capili; Calvin S H Ng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Reasons not to perform uniportal VATS lobectomy.

Authors:  Alan D L Sihoe
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Global development and current evidence of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Cheng-Che Tu; Po-Kuei Hsu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Future study direction on single port (uniportal) VATS.

Authors:  Raffaele Rocco; Gaetano Rocco
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Christopher G Harris; Rebecca S James; David H Tian; Tristan D Yan; Mathew P Doyle; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Christopher Cao
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-03

Review 8.  The Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital subxiphoid approach for lobectomies.

Authors:  Giuseppe Aresu; Liang Wu; Lei Lin; Gening Jiang; Lei Jiang
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-08-04

9.  Advantages and disadvantages of single incision VATS in major anatomical resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  Semih Halezeroğlu
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-08-30

10.  Modular 3-cm uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy with systemic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Yi-Xin Cai; Yu Deng; Sheng-Ling Fu; Xiang-Ning Fu; Ni Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.