| Literature DB >> 26417023 |
Josh J Rosnow1, Marc A Evans2, Maxim V Kapralov3, Asaph B Cousins1, Gerald E Edwards4, Eric H Roalson4.
Abstract
The two carboxylation reactions performed by phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) are vital in the fixation of inorganic carbon for C4 plants. The abundance of PEPC is substantially elevated in C4 leaves, while the location of Rubisco is restricted to one of two chloroplast types. These differences compared with C3 leaves have been shown to result in convergent enzyme optimization in some C4 species. Investigation into the kinetic properties of PEPC and Rubisco from Kranz C4, single cell C4, and C3 species in Chenopodiaceae s. s. subfamily Suaedoideae showed that these major carboxylases in C4 Suaedoideae species lack the same mutations found in other C4 systems which have been examined; but still have similar convergent kinetic properties. Positive selection analysis on the N-terminus of PEPC identified residues 364 and 368 to be under positive selection with a posterior probability >0.99 using Bayes empirical Bayes. Compared with previous analyses on other C4 species, PEPC from C4 Suaedoideae species have different convergent amino acids that result in a higher K m for PEP and malate tolerance compared with C3 species. Kinetic analysis of Rubisco showed that C4 species have a higher catalytic efficiency of Rubisco (k catc in mol CO2 mol(-1) Rubisco active sites s(-1)), despite lacking convergent substitutions in the rbcL gene. The importance of kinetic changes to the two-carboxylation reactions in C4 leaves related to amino acid selection is discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Bienertia; C4 photosynthesis; PAML; Rubisco; Suaedoideae.; phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; positive selection analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26417023 PMCID: PMC4765798 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
PEPC K m-PEP values (pH 7.6) in representative species in subfamily Suaedoideae
Values were determined by curve-fitting the Hill equation to the data. Values represent the average of two biological and two technical replicates. The amino acid residues at positions 733 and 780, M (methionine), S (serine), L (leucine), A (alanine), F (phenylalanine), and V (valine) for the species are from Rosnow et al. (2014) and Besnard et al. (2003) for Z. mays.
| Species | Photosynthetic | Amino acid at | Amino acid |
| Hill coefficient ( | Fold increase by G6P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mode | residue 733 | at residue 780 | No G6P | 5mM G6P | No G6P | +G6P | at 0.3mM PEP | |
|
|
| M | S | 0.83±0.12 | 0.10±0.01 | 2.61±0.12 | 1.13±0.19 | 4.3 |
|
|
| M | S | 1.04±0.14 | 0.14±0.02 | 2.71±0.24 | 0.90±0.08 | 2.7 |
|
|
| L | A | 0.46±0.12 | 0.14±0.01 | 1.45±0.06 | 0.96±0.07 | 3.2 |
|
|
| L | A | 0.67±0.11 | 0.14±0.04 | 1.78±0.21 | 0.98±0.06 | 3.8 |
|
| Single-Cell C4 | L | A | 0.74±0.08 | 0.14±0.02 | 2.13±0.22 | 0.90±0.03 | 2.7 |
|
| C3 | F | A | 0.21±0.01 | 0.03±0.01 | 1.19±0.15 | 1.29±0.25 | 2.3 |
|
| C3 | F | A | 0.27±0.02 | 0.05±0.01 | 0.94±0.15 | 0.93±0.11 | 2.1 |
|
| C3 | F | A | 0.35±0.03 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.95±0.02 | 0.90±0.07 | 2.6 |
|
| C4 | V | S | 1.23±0.07 | 0.15±0.08 | 1.18±0.01 | 1.17±0.07 | 5.0 |
Estimates of malate IC 50 values for half-maximum inhibition of PEPC activity at pH 7.6 (PEP concentration, 2× the K m) in representative photosynthetic types in subfamily Suaedoideae
The amino acid residues potentially involved in malate tolerance are presented. For species comparisons, different letters indicate a significant difference within a category of G6P (+ or –) while comparison of G6P levels within a species is indicated by an asterisk (*) for significance at the P <0.05 level.
| Species | Photosynthetic | Residue at | Residue at | Residue at | Residue at |
|
| Significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mode | 780 | 868 | 879 | 890 | No G6P | 5mM G6P | effect of G6P | |
|
|
| S | R | D | R | 0.6 c | 1.4 c | * |
|
|
| S | R | D | R | 1.0 b | 1.9 b | * |
|
|
| A | L | N | M | 4.5 a | 5.9 a | – |
|
|
| A | L | N | M | 4.5 a | 5.2 a | – |
|
| Single Cell-C4 | A | Q | E | R | 0.9 b | 1.6 bc | * |
|
| C3 | A | K | D | R | 0.3 d | 0.9 d | * |
|
| C3 | A | K | D | R | 0.3 d | 0.8 d | * |
Fig. 1.Representative PEPC kinetics based on photosynthetic mode (C4 or C3) and the amino acids present at residue 733 (M, L, or F) and residue 780 (A or S). PEPC rates were obtained at pH 7.6 with saturating Mg2+ and bicarbonate, while varying phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) concentrations, either in the presence or absence of 5mM glucose-6-phosphate (G6P). The mean data points are presented for each PEPC type while species values are presented in Table 3. The solid line is the Hill equation fit to the data, see the Materials and methods for the equation details.
PEPC V max values with saturating Mg2+ and for representative species in subfamily Suaedoideae at pH 7.6
| Species | Photosynthetic mode |
| Fold increase in activity in presence of G6P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No G6P | + 5mM G6P | |||
| S. accuminata |
| 4.6 | 10.0 | 2.2 |
|
|
| 6.5 | 12.9 | 2.0 |
|
|
| 9.9 | 15.6 | 1.6 |
|
|
| 11.5 | 17.6 | 1.5 |
|
| Single-Cell C4 | 16.5 | 24.1 | 1.5 |
|
| C3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 3.5 |
|
| C3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
|
| C3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.1 |
|
| C4 | 15.1 | 21.1 | 1.4 |
Contrasts of Suaedoideae PEPC kinetic parameters (K m for PEP, Hill coefficient, and V max) under saturating Mg2+ and
Contrasts were done based on amino acid residues 733 (M, L, or F) and 780 (S or A) or photosynthetic mode; see Table 1. In contrasts 1–3, amino acids are compared, MS (C4) occurs in Schoberia species, LA (C4) occurs in Salsina species and single-cell S. aralocaspica, and FA (C3) represents C3 species. In contrasts 4–9, the four photosynthetic modes are being compared, Schoberia type C4 (S. eltonica and S. accuminata), Salsina type C4 (S. fruticosa and S. moquinii), single-cell C4 (S. aralocaspica), and C3 species (S. linearis, S. linifolia, and S. physophora). *, Significant at the P <0.05 level of significance. (+) Indicates whether the first component of the contrast is larger than the second component and (–) indicates that the first component of the contrast is smaller than the second component. Maize data were excluded from analysis.
| Contrast |
| Hill coefficient | PEPC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No G6P | 5mM G6P | No G6P | 5mM G6P | No G6P | 5mM G6P | |
| 1. MS (C4)×LA (C4) | *(+) | (–) | *(+) | (+) | (–) | (–) |
| 2. MS (C4)×FA (C3) | *(+) | *(+) | *(+) | (+) | *(+) | *(+) |
| 3. LA (C4) x FA (C3) | *(+) | *(+) | *(+) | (+) | *(+) | *(+) |
| 4. | *(+) | (–) | *(+) | (+) | *(–) | *(–) |
| 5. | (–) | (–) | (+) | (+) | *(–) | *(–) |
| 6. | (+) | (+) | (–) | (+) | (+) | (–) |
| 7. | *(+) | *(+) | *(+) | (–) | *(+) | *(+) |
| 8. | *(+) | *(+) | *(+) | (–) | *(–) | *(+) |
| 9. SC C4 (LA)×C3 (FA) | *(+) | *(+) | *(+) | (–) | *(+) | *(+) |
Rubisco kcatc (mol CO2 mol–1 binding sites s–1) values for representative photosynthetic types in subfamily Suaedoideae
One way analysis of variance a,b=statistically significant difference based on photosynthetic mode (C3 or C4) (P <0.05).
| Species | Photosynthetic mode | Rubisco | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 2.95 | 0.33 |
|
|
| 3.34 | 1.18 |
|
|
| 3.76 | 0.30 |
|
|
| 4.23 | 0.46 |
|
|
| 3.19 | 0.17 |
| Mean Kranz C4 | 3.49 b | ||
|
| Single-Cell C4 | 3.77 | 0.39 |
|
| Single-Cell C4 | 3.90 | 0.27 |
|
| Single-Cell C4 | 3.46 | 0.34 |
| Mean Single-Cell C4 | 3.71 b | ||
|
| Kranz C4 | 3.58 | 0.00 |
|
| C3 | 1.77 | 0.28 |
|
| C3 | 1.52 | 0.09 |
|
| C3 | 2.08 | 0.17 |
|
| C3 | 1.82 | 0.49 |
| Mean C3 | 1.80 a |