Literature DB >> 26417011

Larger lacertid lizard species produce higher than expected iliotibialis muscle power output: the evolution of muscle contractile mechanics with body size.

Rob S James1, Bieke Vanhooydonck2, Jason A Tallis3, Anthony Herrel4.   

Abstract

Increases in body size can lead to alterations in morphology, physiology, locomotor performance and behaviour of animals. Most studies considering the effects of scaling on muscle performance have studied within-species effects, with few studies considering differences between species. A previous review of published data indicates that maximum muscle-shortening velocity decreases, but that maximum isometric stress does not change, with increased body mass across species of terrestrial animals. However, such previous analyses do not account for the phylogenetic relatedness of the species studied. Our aim was to use phylogenetically informed analysis to determine the effects of body size on isolated iliotibialis muscle performance across 17 species of lacertid lizards. Between one and five individuals were used to obtain mean performance values for each species. We analysed the relationship between each variable and body size, as estimated by snout-vent length (SVL), whilst taking into account the phylogenetic relationships between species. We found that isometric tetanus relaxation time, maximal tetanus stress (force per muscle cross-sectional area) and maximal work loop power output (normalised to muscle mass) all significantly increased with greater SVL. In contrast, fatigue resistance during repeated work loops significantly decreased with SVL and there was no effect of size on tetanus activation time. When we compare our findings with those that would be predicted by dynamic similarity, then as these lacertid species become bigger, there is a greater than expected increase in the normalised muscle power output, probably to counter the larger than expected increase in body mass.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Force; Power output; Scaling; Work loop

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26417011     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.124974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  4 in total

1.  Scaling of work and power in a locomotor muscle of a frog.

Authors:  J P Olberding; S M Deban
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  How to build your dragon: scaling of muscle architecture from the world's smallest to the world's largest monitor lizard.

Authors:  Taylor J M Dick; Christofer J Clemente
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Appendicular Muscle Physiology and Biomechanics in Crocodylus niloticus.

Authors:  Krijn B Michel; Tim G West; Monica A Daley; Vivian R Allen; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-11-05

4.  Functional Segregation within the Muscles of Aquatic Propulsion in the Asiatic Water Monitor (Varanus salvator).

Authors:  Bruce A Young; Jessica Dumais; Nicholas John; Brandon Lyons; Andrew Macduff; Matthew Most; Nathan A Reiser; Peter J Reiser
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.