| Literature DB >> 26416929 |
Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds1, Alexia M Torke2, Paul Helft2, Lucia D Wocial3.
Abstract
This article presents a previously published framework, summarized in the mnemonic ANSWER (A, Active listening; N, Needs assessment; S, Self-awareness/reflection; W, Whose perspective?; E, Elicit values; R, Respond) for how to respond to the question, "Doctor, what would you do?" when considering medical decisions that are preference-sensitive, meaning there is limited or debatable evidence to guide clinical recommendations, or are value-laden, such that the "right" decision may differ based on the context or values of a given individual. Using the mnemonic and practical examples, we attempt to make the framework for an ethically appropriate approach to these conversations more accessible for clinicians. Rather than a decision rule, this mnemonic represents a set of points to consider when physicians are considering an ethically acceptable response that fosters trust and rapport. We apply this approach to a case of periviable counseling, among the more emotionally challenging and value-laden antenatal decisions faced by providers and patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26416929 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-1808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatrics ISSN: 0031-4005 Impact factor: 7.124