Literature DB >> 26416650

Asymmetry in prefrontal resting-state EEG spectral power underlies individual differences in phasic and sustained cognitive control.

Ettore Ambrosini1, Antonino Vallesi2.   

Abstract

In our daily life, we constantly exert sustained and phasic cognitive control processes to manage multiple competing task sets and rapidly switch between them. Increasing research efforts are attempting to unveil how the brain mediates these processes, highlighting the importance of the prefrontal cortex. An intriguing question concerns the influence of hemispheric asymmetries and whether it may be generalized to different cognitive domains depending on lateralized processing. Another currently open question concerns the underlying causes of the observed huge inter-individual variability in cognitive control abilities. Here we tackle these issues by investigating whether participants' hemispheric asymmetry in intrinsic (i.e., resting-state-related) brain dynamics can reflect differences in their phasic and/or sustained cognitive control abilities regardless of the cognitive domain. To this aim, we recorded human participants' resting-state electroencephalographic activity and performed a source-based spectral analysis to assess their lateralized brain dynamics at rest. Moreover, we used three task-switching paradigms involving different cognitive domains to assess participants' domain-general phasic and sustained cognitive control abilities. By performing a series of correlations and an intersection analysis, we showed that participants with stronger left- and right-lateralized intrinsic brain activity in the middle frontal gyrus were more able, respectively, to exert phasic and sustained cognitive control. We propose that the variability in participants' prefrontal hemispheric asymmetry in the intrinsic electrophysiological spectral profile reflects individual differences in preferentially engaging either the left-lateralized, phasic or the right-lateralized, sustained cognitive control processes to regulate their behavior in response to changing task demands, regardless of the specific cognitive domain involved.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Hemispheric asymmetries; Prefrontal cortex; Resting-state EEG; Spectral power; Task-switching

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26416650     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  18 in total

1.  Right-lateralized intrinsic brain dynamics predict monitoring abilities.

Authors:  Ettore Ambrosini; Mariagrazia Capizzi; Sandra Arbula; Antonino Vallesi
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Neurophysiological correlates of cognitive control and approach motivation abnormalities in adolescent bipolar disorders.

Authors:  Erin L Maresh; Joshua J Stim; Abraham C Van Voorhis; Seung Suk Kang; Monica Luciana; Scott R Sponheim; Snežana Urošević
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Neural correlates of acceptance and rejection in online speed dating: An electroencephalography study.

Authors:  Xukai Zhang; M J W van der Molen; Susannah C S A Otieno; Zongling He; Paavo H T Leppänen; Hong Li
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Can Stimulus Valence Modulate Task-Switching Ability? A Pilot Study on Primary School Children.

Authors:  Giulia D'Aurizio; Daniela Tempesta; Gennaro Saporito; Francesca Pistoia; Valentina Socci; Laura Mandolesi; Giuseppe Curcio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Number line estimation and complex mental calculation: Is there a shared cognitive process driving the two tasks?

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; Carlo Semenza
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-05-17

6.  Proactive and reactive metacontrol in task switching.

Authors:  Moon Sun Kang; Yu-Chin Chiu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-06-16

7.  Distinct neural processes support post-success and post-error slowing in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Yihe Zhang; Jaime S Ide; Sheng Zhang; Sien Hu; Nikola S Valchev; Xiaoying Tang; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Speed-accuracy strategy regulations in prefrontal tumor patients.

Authors:  Fabio Campanella; Miran Skrap; Antonino Vallesi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  How Life Experience Shapes Cognitive Control Strategies: The Case of Air Traffic Control Training.

Authors:  Sandra Arbula; Mariagrazia Capizzi; Nicoletta Lombardo; Antonino Vallesi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Domain-General Processes in Task-Switching.

Authors:  Mariagrazia Capizzi; Ettore Ambrosini; Sandra Arbula; Ilaria Mazzonetto; Antonino Vallesi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.