BACKGROUND: Symptomatic left atrial (LA) flutter (LAFL) is common after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association of baseline LA function with incident LAFL after AF ablation. METHODS: The source cohort included 216 patients with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) before initial AF ablation between 2010 and 2013. Patients who underwent cryoballoon or laser ablation, patients with AF during CMR, and those with suboptimal CMR, or missing follow-up data were excluded. Baseline LA volume and function were assessed by feature-tracking CMR analysis. RESULTS: The final cohort included 119 patients (mean age 58.9 ± 11 years; 76.5% men; 70.6% patients with paroxysmal AF). During a median follow-up of 421 days (interquartile range 235-751 days), 22 patients (18.5%) had incident LAFL. Baseline LA volume was similar between the 2 groups. In contrast, baseline reservoir, conduit, and contractile function of the LA were significantly impaired in patients with incident LAFL. Baseline global peak longitudinal atrial strain (PLAS) <22.65% predicted incident LAFL with 86% sensitivity and 68% specificity (C statistic 0.76). In a multivariable model adjusting for age, heart failure, and LA volume, PLAS (hazard ratio 0.9 per % increase in PLAS; P = .003) and LA linear lesions (hazard ratio 2.94; P = .020) were independently associated with incident LAFL. The coexistence of PLAS <22.65% and linear lesions was associated with 9-fold increased hazard of incident LAFL. CONCLUSION: Baseline LA function and linear lesions were independently associated with incident LAFL after AF ablation. Linear lesions should be limited to selected cases, especially in patients with impaired LA function.
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic left atrial (LA) flutter (LAFL) is common after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association of baseline LA function with incident LAFL after AF ablation. METHODS: The source cohort included 216 patients with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) before initial AF ablation between 2010 and 2013. Patients who underwent cryoballoon or laser ablation, patients with AF during CMR, and those with suboptimal CMR, or missing follow-up data were excluded. Baseline LA volume and function were assessed by feature-tracking CMR analysis. RESULTS: The final cohort included 119 patients (mean age 58.9 ± 11 years; 76.5% men; 70.6% patients with paroxysmal AF). During a median follow-up of 421 days (interquartile range 235-751 days), 22 patients (18.5%) had incident LAFL. Baseline LA volume was similar between the 2 groups. In contrast, baseline reservoir, conduit, and contractile function of the LA were significantly impaired in patients with incident LAFL. Baseline global peak longitudinal atrial strain (PLAS) <22.65% predicted incident LAFL with 86% sensitivity and 68% specificity (C statistic 0.76). In a multivariable model adjusting for age, heart failure, and LA volume, PLAS (hazard ratio 0.9 per % increase in PLAS; P = .003) and LA linear lesions (hazard ratio 2.94; P = .020) were independently associated with incident LAFL. The coexistence of PLAS <22.65% and linear lesions was associated with 9-fold increased hazard of incident LAFL. CONCLUSION: Baseline LA function and linear lesions were independently associated with incident LAFL after AF ablation. Linear lesions should be limited to selected cases, especially in patients with impaired LA function.
Authors: Sachin Gupta; Susan A Matulevicius; Colby R Ayers; Jarett D Berry; Parag C Patel; David W Markham; Benjamin D Levine; Kelly M Chin; James A de Lemos; Ronald M Peshock; Mark H Drazner Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Christoph Hammerstingl; Marieke Schwekendiek; Diana Momcilovic; Robert Schueler; Jan-Malte Sinning; Jan W Schrickel; Erica Mittmann-Braun; Georg Nickenig; Lars Lickfett Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2011-09-28
Authors: Ayman A Hussein; Walid I Saliba; David O Martin; Mandeep Bhargava; Minerva Sherman; Christina Magnelli-Reyes; Mohammed Chamsi-Pasha; Seby John; Michelle Williams-Adrews; Bryan Baranowski; Thomas Dresing; Thomas Callahan; Mohamed Kanj; Patrick Tchou; Bruce D Lindsay; Andrea Natale; Oussama Wazni Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2011-04-14
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; José Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Kristina Wasmer; Gerold Mönnig; Alex Bittner; Dirk Dechering; Stephan Zellerhoff; Peter Milberg; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Yuko Y Inoue; Abdullah Alissa; Irfan M Khurram; Kotaro Fukumoto; Mohammadali Habibi; Bharath A Venkatesh; Stefan L Zimmerman; Saman Nazarian; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Joao A Lima; Hiroshi Ashikaga Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 5.501