BACKGROUND: Removal of embedded partially covered self-expanding metal stents (PCSEMS) is associated with an increased risk of adverse events compared with removal of fully covered self-expanding stents (FCSES) due to tissue ingrowth. Successful removal of embedded PCSEMS has been described by the stent-in-stent (SIS) technique. AIMS: To report the first US experience from three high-volume quaternary care centers on the safety and efficacy of the SIS technique for removal of embedded PCSEMS. METHODS: Retrospective study of outcomes for consecutive patients who underwent the SIS for removal of embedded PCSEMS over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Twenty-seven embedded PCSEMS were successfully removed using the SIS technique (100 %) from 25 patients (11 males), median age 65 (range 37-80). All stents were successfully removed in one endoscopic session (no repeat SIS procedures were required for persistently embedded stents). The embedded PCSEMS had been in situ for a median of 76 days (range 26-501). Median SIS dwell time (FCSES in situ of PCSEMS) was 13 days (interquartile range 8-16 days; range 4-212 days). One adverse event (self-limited bleeding) occurred during a median follow-up period of 3 months (range 1-32). No patients died, required surgery, or had long-term disability due to adverse events attributed to the SIS technique. Twelve patients required additional interventions following SIS procedure for persistence or recurrence of the underlying pathology. CONCLUSION: When performed by experienced endoscopists, safe and effective removal of embedded PCSEMS can be achieved via the SIS technique.
BACKGROUND: Removal of embedded partially covered self-expanding metal stents (PCSEMS) is associated with an increased risk of adverse events compared with removal of fully covered self-expanding stents (FCSES) due to tissue ingrowth. Successful removal of embedded PCSEMS has been described by the stent-in-stent (SIS) technique. AIMS: To report the first US experience from three high-volume quaternary care centers on the safety and efficacy of the SIS technique for removal of embedded PCSEMS. METHODS: Retrospective study of outcomes for consecutive patients who underwent the SIS for removal of embedded PCSEMS over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Twenty-seven embedded PCSEMS were successfully removed using the SIS technique (100 %) from 25 patients (11 males), median age 65 (range 37-80). All stents were successfully removed in one endoscopic session (no repeat SIS procedures were required for persistently embedded stents). The embedded PCSEMS had been in situ for a median of 76 days (range 26-501). Median SIS dwell time (FCSES in situ of PCSEMS) was 13 days (interquartile range 8-16 days; range 4-212 days). One adverse event (self-limited bleeding) occurred during a median follow-up period of 3 months (range 1-32). No patients died, required surgery, or had long-term disability due to adverse events attributed to the SIS technique. Twelve patients required additional interventions following SIS procedure for persistence or recurrence of the underlying pathology. CONCLUSION: When performed by experienced endoscopists, safe and effective removal of embedded PCSEMS can be achieved via the SIS technique.
Authors: Bruno da Costa Martins; Felipe Alves Retes; Bruno Frederico Medrado; Marcelo Simas de Lima; Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi; Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti; Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro; Ricardo Sato Uemura; Fauze Maluf-Filho Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2014-02-16
Authors: William A Ross; Firas Alkassab; Patrick M Lynch; Gregory D Ayers; Jaffer Ajani; Jeffrey H Lee; Mike Bismar Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Raju P Wadhwa; Richard A Kozarek; Renee E France; John J Brandabur; Michael Gluck; Donald E Low; L William Traverso; Ravi Moonka; William L Traverso Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Massimo Conio; Alessandro Repici; Giorgio Battaglia; Giovanni De Pretis; Luigi Ghezzo; Max Bittinger; Helmut Messmann; Jean-François Demarquay; Sabrina Blanchi; Michele Togni; Rita Conigliaro; Rosangela Filiberti Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Petra G A van Boeckel; Kulwinder S Dua; Bas L A M Weusten; Ruben J H Schmits; Naveen Surapaneni; Robin Timmer; Frank P Vleggaar; Peter D Siersema Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Christine Hill; Bassem K Khalil; Sindhu Barola; Abhishek Agnihotri; Robert A Moran; Yen-I Chen; Saowanee Ngamruengphong; Vikesh K Singh; Leigh A Frame; Michael A Schweitzer; Thomas H Magnuson; Mouen A Khashab; Patrick I Okolo; Vivek Kumbhari Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Gum Mo Jung; Seung Hyun Lee; Dae Seong Myung; Wan Sik Lee; Young Eun Joo; Mi Ran Jung; Seong Yeob Ryu; Young Kyu Park; Sung Bum Cho Journal: J Gastric Cancer Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 3.720