Literature DB >> 26416048

Ipsilateral in-breast tumor recurrence after breast conserving therapy: true recurrence versus new primary tumor.

Elena Alexandrova1, Sonya Sergieva, Petia Kostova, Iglika Mihaylova, Dimitar Katzarov, Angel Milev.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To classify ipsilateral in-breast cancer recurrences (IBCR) in patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy, either as new primary tumor (NP) or true recurrence (TR) and to assess the prognostic and therapeutic importance of this classification.
METHODS: The records of 107 patients treated for local tu- mor recurrence after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) at the National Cancer Center, Sofia, between March 1999 and May 2011 were retrospectively analysed. The patients'primary tumors were up to 2 cm in size. For their primary tumors all patients underwent quadrantectomy, axillary lymph node dissection and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) up to 50 Gy. In cases with nodal metastasis additional RT has been used. Adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonotherapy have been used according to the clinical indications and depending of the patient's condition. Every attempt was made to define a tumor as a TR or NP, based on the changes in location and histology. (99m)Tc-MIBI SPECT-CT was used to localize the site of recurrence.
RESULTS: Forty-four (41.1%) of the relapses were TR and 63 (58.9%) NPs. Out of 63 relapses defined as NPs, 54 (85.7%) changed the location and 49 (68.3%) had a different histology. The age of patients with TR and with NP did not differ significantly at the time of diagnosis of the primary tumor (TR 48.8±10.45 years vs NP 50.8±10.56; p<0.330), but those who developed TR were significantly younger than those with NP at the time of recurrence (TR 53 years, 66±11.1 vs NP 58.15+10.6; p<0.05). Recurrences defined as NPs, developed after a significantly longer period of time in comparison to the TRs (7.4±2.6 years vs 4.8±2.2 years; p<0.0001). Five-year overall survival of patients with TR was significantly lower compared to patients with NP (31.8% vs 96.7% p=0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrences developing after BCT represent different clinical events, having different origin, prognosis and, therefore, requiring different type of treatment. It seems that a significant part of the recurrences that develop in the residual parenchyma, following BCT, are new carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26416048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J BUON        ISSN: 1107-0625            Impact factor:   2.533


  3 in total

1.  Impact of an In Situ Component on Outcome After In-Breast Tumor Recurrence in Patients Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy.

Authors:  James Laird; Benjamin Lok; Chun Siu; Oren Cahlon; Atif J Khan; Beryl McCormick; Simon N Powell; Hiram Cody; Hannah Yong Wen; Alice Ho; Lior Z Braunstein
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Repeat breast-conserving treatment of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: a nationwide survey amongst breast surgeons and radiation oncologists in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Coco J E F Walstra; Robert-Jan Schipper; Yvonne E van Riet; Peter-Paul G van der Toorn; Marjolein L Smidt; Maurice J C Vd Sangen; Adri C Voogd; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Prognostic Factors and Surgery for Breast Cancer Patients With Locoregional Recurrence: An Analysis of 5,202 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Jiahui Huang; Yiwei Tong; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.