Literature DB >> 26414220

Denosumab-treated Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Exhibits Morphologic Overlap With Malignant Giant Cell Tumor of Bone.

John Wojcik1, Andrew E Rosenberg, Miriam A Bredella, Edwin Choy, Francis J Hornicek, G Petur Nielsen, Vikram Deshpande.   

Abstract

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is a locally aggressive benign neoplasm characterized by an abundance of osteoclastic giant cells that are induced by the neoplastic mononuclear cells; the latter express high levels of receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-B ligand (RANKL). Denosumab, a RANKL inhibitor, which is clinically used to treat GCT, leads to a marked alteration in the histologic appearance of the tumor with giant cell depletion and new bone deposition, leading to substantial histologic overlap with other primary tumors of bone. Most significantly, denosumab-treated GCT (tGCT) with abundant bone deposition may mimic de novo osteosarcoma, or GCT that has undergone malignant transformation. To histologically characterize tGCT, we identified 9 cases of GCT biopsied or resected after denosumab treatment. tGCT cases included 16 specimens from 9 patients including 6 female and 3 male individuals aged 16 to 47 (median 32) years. Duration of treatment varied from 2 to 55 months. We compared these tumors with malignant neoplasms arising in GCTs (n=9). The histology of tGCT was variable but appeared to relate to the length of therapy. All tGCTs showed marked giant cell depletion. Early lesions were highly cellular, and the combination of cellularity, atypia, and haphazard bone deposition caused the lesion to resemble high-grade osteosarcoma. Unlike de novo high-grade osteosarcoma or malignancies arising in GCT, however, tGCT showed less severe atypia, reduced mitotic activity, and lack of infiltrative growth pattern. Tumor in patients on prolonged therapy showed decreased cellularity and abundant new bone, deposited as broad, rounded cords or long, curvilinear arrays. The latter morphology was reminiscent of low-grade central osteosarcoma, but, unlike low-grade central osteosarcoma, tGCT was negative for MDM2 and again lacked an infiltrative growth pattern. Overall, tGCT may have a wide range of morphologic appearances. Because the treated tumors bear little resemblance to their pretreatment counterparts, careful attention to the history of denosumab administration is crucial to avoid a misdiagnosis with an important impact on therapy. Unlike malignant GCTs, tGCTs lack significant nuclear atypia, mitotic activity, and infiltration of preexisting bone, but instead show a unique pattern of intralesional bone deposition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26414220     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  24 in total

1.  Giant cell tumor of bone: imaging and histology changes after denosumab treatment : Comment on: von Borstel D, Taguibao RA, Strle NA, Burns JE. Giant cell tumor of the bone: Aggressive case initially treated with denosumab and intralesional surgery. Skeletal Radiol 2017;46:571-578.

Authors:  Yaxia Zhang; Hakan Ilaslan; Thomas W Bauer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Histone H3.3 mutation in giant cell tumor of bone: an update in pathology.

Authors:  Hidetaka Yamamoto; Shin Ishihara; Yu Toda; Yoshinao Oda
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  Denosumab in Patients with Giant Cell Tumor and Its Recurrence: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Khodamorad Jamshidi; Mohamad Gharehdaghi; Sami Sam Hajialiloo; Masoud Mirkazemi; Kamran Ghaffarzadehgan; Azra Izanloo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-07

4.  Clinicopathological Features of a Series of 27 Cases of Post-Denosumab Treated Giant Cell Tumors of Bones: A Single Institutional Experience at a Tertiary Cancer Referral Centre, India.

Authors:  Bharat Rekhi; Vivek Verma; Ashish Gulia; Nirmala A Jambhekar; Subhash Desai; Shashikant L Juvekar; Jyoti Bajpai; Ajay Puri
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Symplastic/pseudoanaplastic giant cell tumor of the bone.

Authors:  Judy Sarungbam; Narasimhan Agaram; Sinchun Hwang; Chao Lu; Lu Wang; John Healey; Meera Hameed
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Giant cell rich osteosarcoma revisited-diagnostic criteria and histopathologic patterns, Ki67, CDK4, and MDM2 expression, changes in response to bisphosphonate and denosumab treatment.

Authors:  Louis Tsun Cheung Chow
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  Soft Tissue Special Issue: Giant Cell-Rich Lesions of the Head and Neck Region.

Authors:  Jen-Chieh Lee; Hsuan-Ying Huang
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2020-01-16

8.  Preoperative Denosumab With Curettage and Cryotherapy in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Is There an Increased Risk of Local Recurrence?

Authors:  Guido Scoccianti; Francesca Totti; Maurizio Scorianz; Giacomo Baldi; Giuliana Roselli; Giovanni Beltrami; Alessandro Franchi; Rodolfo Capanna; Domenico Andrea Campanacci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Malignant giant cell tumour of bone: a review of clinical, pathological and imaging features.

Authors:  Ismail Tahir; Vanghelita Andrei; Robin Pollock; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Osteoclasts in Tumor Biology: Metastasis and Epithelial-Mesenchymal-Myeloid Transition.

Authors:  Kemal Behzatoglu
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.