Susanne J Pedersen1, Denis Poddubnyy2, Inge J Sørensen3, Anne-Gitte Loft4, Jens S Hindrup5, Gorm Thamsborg3, Karsten Asmussen6, Oliver Hendricks7, Jesper Nørregaard8, Anne-Dorthe Piil9, Jakob M Møller10, Anne-Grethe Jurik11, Lone Balding10, Robert G Lambert12, Joachim Sieper2, Mikkel Østergaard3. 1. Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen Gentofte Hospital, and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. 3. Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen Glostrup Hospital and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Sygehus Lillebaelt, Vejle, and Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade, Aarhus, Denmark. 5. University of Copenhagen Gentofte Hospital and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 6. Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Graasten, Denmark. 8. Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 9. Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark. 10. University of Copenhagen Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark. 11. Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade, Aarhus, Denmark. 12. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assessed inflammation and structural lesions in the sacroiliac (SI) joints during treatment with adalimumab versus placebo. METHODS: In a 48-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 52 patients with spondyloarthritis were randomized to receive subcutaneous injections of either adalimumab 40 mg (n = 25) or placebo (n = 27) every other week for 12 weeks. Patients in the adalimumab group continued to receive and patients in the placebo group were switched to adalimumab 40 mg every other week for an additional 12 weeks. MRI of the SI joints was performed at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48, and the images were assessed independently in a blinded manner using the modified Berlin and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scores for inflammation and structural lesions of the SI joints. RESULTS: At baseline, 56% of the adalimumab group and ∼72% of the placebo group had an MRI-assessed inflammation score of ≥1. Among the patients with inflammation at baseline, the mean percent reductions in MRI scores for inflammation from week 0 to 12 were greater in the adalimumab group compared with the placebo group (Berlin method, -62% versus -5%; SPARCC method, -58% versus -12% [both P < 0.04]). Furthermore, the mean SPARCC erosion score decreased (-0.6) and the SPARCC backfill score increased (+0.8) in the adalimumab group from week 0 to week 12. From week 12 to week 24, larger absolute reductions in the Berlin/SPARCC inflammation scores and the SPARCC erosion score and larger increases in the Berlin/SPARCC fatty lesion scores were seen in the placebo group compared with the adalimumab group. In univariate regression analyses (analysis of covariance) and multivariate stepwise regression analyses, treatment with adalimumab was independently associated with regression of the SPARCC erosion score from week 0 to 12 but not with changes in the other types of MRI lesions. CONCLUSION: Significant changes in the Berlin and SPARCC MRI-assessed inflammation scores and in the SPARCCMRI-assessed erosion scores occurred within 12 weeks after initiation of adalimumab. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment was associated with resolution of erosions and the development of backfill.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assessed inflammation and structural lesions in the sacroiliac (SI) joints during treatment with adalimumab versus placebo. METHODS: In a 48-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 52 patients with spondyloarthritis were randomized to receive subcutaneous injections of either adalimumab 40 mg (n = 25) or placebo (n = 27) every other week for 12 weeks. Patients in the adalimumab group continued to receive and patients in the placebo group were switched to adalimumab 40 mg every other week for an additional 12 weeks. MRI of the SI joints was performed at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48, and the images were assessed independently in a blinded manner using the modified Berlin and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scores for inflammation and structural lesions of the SI joints. RESULTS: At baseline, 56% of the adalimumab group and ∼72% of the placebo group had an MRI-assessed inflammation score of ≥1. Among the patients with inflammation at baseline, the mean percent reductions in MRI scores for inflammation from week 0 to 12 were greater in the adalimumab group compared with the placebo group (Berlin method, -62% versus -5%; SPARCC method, -58% versus -12% [both P < 0.04]). Furthermore, the mean SPARCC erosion score decreased (-0.6) and the SPARCC backfill score increased (+0.8) in the adalimumab group from week 0 to week 12. From week 12 to week 24, larger absolute reductions in the Berlin/SPARCC inflammation scores and the SPARCC erosion score and larger increases in the Berlin/SPARCC fatty lesion scores were seen in the placebo group compared with the adalimumab group. In univariate regression analyses (analysis of covariance) and multivariate stepwise regression analyses, treatment with adalimumab was independently associated with regression of the SPARCC erosion score from week 0 to 12 but not with changes in the other types of MRI lesions. CONCLUSION: Significant changes in the Berlin and SPARCC MRI-assessed inflammation scores and in the SPARCC MRI-assessed erosion scores occurred within 12 weeks after initiation of adalimumab. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment was associated with resolution of erosions and the development of backfill.
Authors: Jakob M Møller; Mikkel Østergaard; Henrik S Thomsen; Simon Krabbe; Inge J Sørensen; Bente Jensen; Ole Rintek Madsen; Mette Klarlund; Susanne J Pedersen Journal: Eur J Radiol Open Date: 2020-11-05
Authors: U Kiltz; J Braun; A Becker; J-F Chenot; M Dreimann; L Hammel; A Heiligenhaus; K-G Hermann; R Klett; D Krause; K-F Kreitner; U Lange; A Lauterbach; W Mau; R Mössner; U Oberschelp; S Philipp; U Pleyer; M Rudwaleit; E Schneider; T L Schulte; J Sieper; A Stallmach; B Swoboda; M Winking Journal: Z Rheumatol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.372
Authors: Pamela F Weiss; Walter P Maksymowych; Robert G Lambert; Jacob L Jaremko; David M Biko; Joel Paschke; Timothy G Brandon; Rui Xiao; Nancy A Chauvin Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Walter P Maksymowych; Pascal Claudepierre; Manouk de Hooge; Robert G Lambert; Robert Landewé; Anna Molto; Désirée van der Heijde; Jack F Bukowski; Heather Jones; Ron Pedersen; Annette Szumski; Bonnie Vlahos; Maxime Dougados Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Walter P Maksymowych; Stephanie Wichuk; Maxime Dougados; Heather E Jones; Ron Pedersen; Annette Szumski; Lisa Marshall; Jack F Bukowski; Robert G Lambert Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: P A C Bakker; S Ramiro; Z Ez-Zaitouni; M van Lunteren; I J Berg; R Landewé; R Ramonda; M van Oosterhout; M Reijnierse; F A van Gaalen; D van der Heijde Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Queeny Madari; Alexandre Sepriano; Sofia Ramiro; Anna Molto; Pascal Claudepierre; Daniel Wendling; Maxime Dougados; Desirée van der Heijde; Floris A van Gaalen Journal: RMD Open Date: 2020-02