Literature DB >> 26413953

Why Is Studying the Genetics of Intelligence So Controversial?

James Tabery.   

Abstract

From the very beginning, studies of the nature and nurture of intelligence have been closely associated with an interest in intervening, and those interventions have been surrounded by controversy. The nature of those controversies has not always been the same, however. Since the mid-nineteenth century, when Francis Galton imagined a science that would assess the extent to which a trait like "genius" was due to nature or due to nurture, science and technology have changed dramatically, and so have the interventions that have been envisioned in light of those developments. A scientist today can search for particular stretches of DNA and assess whether differences in those stretches are associated with differences in a human trait of interest; a genetic counselor today can genetically test an individual (be it an embryo, fetus, newborn, child, or adult) and provide information about what that genetic result means, allowing for interventions that can range from terminating a pregnancy to prescribing chemotherapy. So when one asks a question like, "Why is studying the genetics of intelligence controversial?," it is important to realize up front that the answer will be, "It can be controversial for a variety of different reasons, and those reasons have evolved over time." The purpose of this essay is to provide a survey of the controversies that surround genetic studies of intelligence. With the survey in place, I will then draw out several lessons both for scientists who study the genetics of intelligence as well as for science studies scholars (bioethicists, philosophers, historians, sociologists) who reflect and comment on the controversies surrounding that research.
© 2015 The Hastings Center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26413953     DOI: 10.1002/hast.492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  4 in total

1.  Screening Human Embryos for Polygenic Traits Has Limited Utility.

Authors:  Ehud Karavani; Or Zuk; Danny Zeevi; Nir Barzilai; Nikos C Stefanis; Alex Hatzimanolis; Nikolaos Smyrnis; Dimitrios Avramopoulos; Leonid Kruglyak; Gil Atzmon; Max Lam; Todd Lencz; Shai Carmi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Taking a Stand: The Genetics Community's Responsibility for Intelligence Research.

Authors:  Shawneequa L Callier; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

3.  'Mr Cummings clearly does not understand the science of genetics and should maybe go back to school on the subject': an exploratory content analysis of the online comments beneath a controversial news story.

Authors:  Madeline Crosswaite; Kathryn Asbury
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2016-11-03

4.  Commentary on 'Moral reasons to edit the human genome': this is not the moral imperative we are looking for.

Authors:  Sarah Chan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.903

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.