Literature DB >> 26413890

Strategy use fully mediates the relationship between working memory capacity and performance on Raven's matrices.

Corentin Gonthier1, Noémylle Thomassin2.   

Abstract

Working memory capacity consistently correlates with fluid intelligence. It has been suggested that this relationship is partly attributable to strategy use: Participants with high working memory capacity would use more effective strategies, in turn leading to higher performance on fluid intelligence tasks. However, this idea has never been directly investigated. In 2 experiments, we tested this hypothesis by directly manipulating strategy use in a combined experimental-correlational approach (Experiment 1; N = 250) and by measuring strategy use with a self-report questionnaire (Experiment 2; N = 93). Inducing all participants to use an effective strategy in Raven's matrices decreased the correlation between working memory capacity and performance; the strategy use measure fully mediated the relationship between working memory capacity and performance on the matrices task. These findings indicate that individual differences in strategic behavior drive the predictive utility of working memory. We interpret the results within a theoretical framework integrating the multiple mediators of the relationship between working memory capacity and high-level cognition. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26413890     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  4 in total

1.  Individual differences in spontaneous analogical transfer.

Authors:  James R Kubricht; Hongjing Lu; Keith J Holyoak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

2.  Moderating Effects of Self-Efficacy and Time Pressure on the Relationship Between Employee Aging and Work Performance.

Authors:  Fuda Li; Shuang Liu; Fawang Zhang; Huaqian Huang
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2022-04-24

3.  Individual differences in explicit and implicit visuomotor learning and working memory capacity.

Authors:  Antonios I Christou; R Chris Miall; Fiona McNab; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A Tempest in A Ladle: The Debate about the Roles of General and Specific Abilities in Predicting Important Outcomes.

Authors:  Wendy Johnson
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2018-04-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.