Literature DB >> 26413774

A randomised control trial of the cognitive effects of working in a seated as opposed to a standing position in office workers.

Bridget A Russell1, Mathew J Summers2,3, Peter J Tranent1, Matthew A Palmer1, P Dean Cooley4, Scott J Pedersen4.   

Abstract

Sedentary behaviour is increasing and has been identified as a potential significant health risk, particularly for desk-based employees. The development of sit-stand workstations in the workplace is one approach to reduce sedentary behaviour. However, there is uncertainty about the effects of sit-stand workstations on cognitive functioning. A sample of 36 university staff participated in a within-subjects randomised control trial examining the effect of sitting vs. standing for one hour per day for five consecutive days on attention, information processing speed, short-term memory, working memory and task efficiency. The results of the study showed no statistically significant difference in cognitive performance or work efficiency between the sitting and standing conditions, with all effect sizes being small to very small (all ds < .2). This result suggests that the use of sit-stand workstations is not associated with a reduction in cognitive performance. Practitioner Summary: Although it has been reported that the use of sit-stand desks may help offset adverse health effects of prolonged sitting, there is scant evidence about changes in productivity. This randomised control study showed that there was no difference between sitting and standing for one hour on cognitive function or task efficiency in university staff.

Keywords:  Sitting; cognitive function; randomised control trial; sedentary; standing; work efficiency

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26413774     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1094579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Taking a Stand: The Effects of Standing Desks on Task Performance and Engagement.

Authors:  Laura E Finch; A Janet Tomiyama; Andrew Ward
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  The Impact of Active Workstations on Workplace Productivity and Performance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samson O Ojo; Daniel P Bailey; Angel M Chater; David J Hewson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Sedentary Behavior at Work and Cognitive Functioning: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valentin Magnon; Guillaume T Vallet; Catherine Auxiette
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-08-31

4.  The Short Term Musculoskeletal and Cognitive Effects of Prolonged Sitting During Office Computer Work.

Authors:  Richelle Baker; Pieter Coenen; Erin Howie; Ann Williamson; Leon Straker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Controversies in the Science of Sedentary Behaviour and Health: Insights, Perspectives and Future directions from the 2018 Queensland Sedentary Behaviour Think Tank.

Authors:  Stuart J H Biddle; Jason A Bennie; Katrien De Cocker; David Dunstan; Paul A Gardiner; Genevieve N Healy; Brigid Lynch; Neville Owen; Charlotte Brakenridge; Wendy Brown; Matthew Buman; Bronwyn Clark; Ing-Mari Dohrn; Mitch Duncan; Nicholas Gilson; Tracy Kolbe-Alexander; Toby Pavey; Natasha Reid; Corneel Vandelanotte; Ineke Vergeer; Grace E Vincent
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.