| Literature DB >> 26413337 |
Olfat Hammam1, Hani H Nour2, Maha Mosaad3, Maha Akl1, Heba Khalil3, Hossam Al Ganzory2, Ali Hindawi3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HER2 oncoprotein expression by both immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in different benign and malignant bladder lesions, and the effect of bilharzial infestation on this expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective controlled study, 72 patients were classified into a control group, and groups with cystitis, urothelial carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). HER2 was detected using standard IHC staining and FISH in all groups. The correlation of HER2 expression with tumour type, stage and grade in relation to normal urothelium and cystitis was assessed. The effect of schistosomal infestation was evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: (N)MI, (non-)muscle-invasive; Bladder cancer; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; HER2; IHC, immunohistochemical; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; Schistosomiasis; Squamous; TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumour; Transitional
Year: 2015 PMID: 26413337 PMCID: PMC4561918 DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.01.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arab J Urol ISSN: 2090-598X
The clinico-pathological distribution in the various groups, and the HER2 protein and gene immunoexpression by IHC and HER2 gene expression using FISH.
| Group | M/F | HER2 by IHC (score), | HER2 by FISH, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative (0/1+) | Equivocal (2+) | Strongly positive (3+) | Not amplified | Polysomy | Amplified | |||
| Control | 10 | 8/2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Cystitis | 10 | 6/4 | ||||||
| Bilharzial | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| Not bilharzial | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| SCC | ||||||||
| Bilharzial | 19 | 12/7 | 9 (47) | 3 (16) | 7 (37) | 7 (37) | 2 (11) | 10 (53) |
| Not bilharzial | 0 | |||||||
| TCC | 33 | 23/10 | 13 (39) | 11 (33) | 9 (27) | 20 (61) | 2 (6) | 11 (33) |
| Ta | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 | |
| T1 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| T2–3 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 | |
| Low-grade | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | |
| High-grade | 24 | 7 (29) | 8 (33) | 9 (38) | 12 (50) | 1 (4) | 11 (46) | |
| Bilharzial | 16 | 9 (56) | 2 (13) | 5 (31) | 10 (63) | 1 (6) | 5 (31) | |
| Not bilharzial | 17 | 4 (24) | 9 (53) | 4 (24) | 10 (63) | 1 (6) | 6 (35) | |
FISH vs. IHC.
P < 0.01, positive HER2.
P < 0.05, positive HER2.
P < 0.01, positive HER2.
P < 0.1, negative HER2.
P < 0.01, positive HER2.
P < 0.01, positive HER2.
P < 0.01, positive HER2.
Figure 1IHC staining of the study group tissues. (A) A control showing negative HER2 protein, scoring 1+ in the urothelial lining. (B) A case of polypod cystitis showing negative HER2 protein immunoexpression, score 2+, IHC, Her2, DAB, ×200. (C) A case of poorly differentiated urothelial TCC, showing equivocal HER2 protein immunoexpression in >30% of tumour cells; IHC, Her2, DAB, ×400. (D) A case of papillary urothelial carcinoma showing strong HER2 protein immunoexpression, score 3+ in >70% of cells; IHC, Her2, DAB, ×200. (E) A case of moderately differentiated schistosomal-associated SCC, strongly positive for HER2 protein, score 3+; IHC, Her2, DAB, ×400. (F) A case of moderately differentiated SCC, grade II, showing negative HER2 protein immunoexpression, score 1+, IHC, Her2, DAB, ×200.
Figure 2HER2 amplification by FISH. (A) Papillary urothelial TCC, negative for HER2 gene amplification. (B) Urothelial TCC, positive for HER2 gene amplification, showing red clusters. (C) Bilharzial SCC, negative for HER2 gene amplification. (D) SCC, positive for HER2 gene amplification, showing >6 red signals per cell. All ×60.