Pierre-Yves Rabattu1, Benoit Massé2, Federico Ulliana3, Marie-Christine Rousset3, Damien Rohmer4, Jean-Claude Léon2, Olivier Palombi5. 1. Department of Anatomy, LADAF, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France. 2. LJK (CNRS-UJF-INPG-UPMF), INRIA, Université de Grenoble, Grenoble, France. 3. LIG (CNRS-UJF-INPG-UPMF), Université de Grenoble, Grenoble, France. 4. LJK (CNRS-UJF-INPG-UPMF), INRIA, Université de Grenoble, Grenoble, France ; CPE Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France. 5. Department of Anatomy, LADAF, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France ; LJK (CNRS-UJF-INPG-UPMF), INRIA, Université de Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Embryology is a complex morphologic discipline involving a set of entangled mechanisms, sometime difficult to understand and to visualize. Recent computer based techniques ranging from geometrical to physically based modeling are used to assist the visualization and the simulation of virtual humans for numerous domains such as surgical simulation and learning. On the other side, the ontology-based approach applied to knowledge representation is more and more successfully adopted in the life-science domains to formalize biological entities and phenomena, thanks to a declarative approach for expressing and reasoning over symbolic information. 3D models and ontologies are two complementary ways to describe biological entities that remain largely separated. Indeed, while many ontologies providing a unified formalization of anatomy and embryology exist, they remain only descriptive and make the access to anatomical content of complex 3D embryology models and simulations difficult. RESULTS: In this work, we present a novel ontology describing the development of the human embryology deforming 3D models. Beyond describing how organs and structures are composed, our ontology integrates a procedural description of their 3D representations, temporal deformation and relations with respect to their developments. We also created inferences rules to express complex connections between entities. It results in a unified description of both the knowledge of the organs deformation and their 3D representations enabling to visualize dynamically the embryo deformation during the Carnegie stages. Through a simplified ontology, containing representative entities which are linked to spatial position and temporal process information, we illustrate the added-value of such a declarative approach for interactive simulation and visualization of 3D embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Combining ontologies and 3D models enables a declarative description of different embryological models that capture the complexity of human developmental anatomy. Visualizing embryos with 3D geometric models and their animated deformations perhaps paves the way towards some kind of hypothesis-driven application. These can also be used to assist the learning process of this complex knowledge. AVAILABILITY: http://www.mycorporisfabrica.org/.
BACKGROUND: Embryology is a complex morphologic discipline involving a set of entangled mechanisms, sometime difficult to understand and to visualize. Recent computer based techniques ranging from geometrical to physically based modeling are used to assist the visualization and the simulation of virtual humans for numerous domains such as surgical simulation and learning. On the other side, the ontology-based approach applied to knowledge representation is more and more successfully adopted in the life-science domains to formalize biological entities and phenomena, thanks to a declarative approach for expressing and reasoning over symbolic information. 3D models and ontologies are two complementary ways to describe biological entities that remain largely separated. Indeed, while many ontologies providing a unified formalization of anatomy and embryology exist, they remain only descriptive and make the access to anatomical content of complex 3D embryology models and simulations difficult. RESULTS: In this work, we present a novel ontology describing the development of the human embryology deforming 3D models. Beyond describing how organs and structures are composed, our ontology integrates a procedural description of their 3D representations, temporal deformation and relations with respect to their developments. We also created inferences rules to express complex connections between entities. It results in a unified description of both the knowledge of the organs deformation and their 3D representations enabling to visualize dynamically the embryo deformation during the Carnegie stages. Through a simplified ontology, containing representative entities which are linked to spatial position and temporal process information, we illustrate the added-value of such a declarative approach for interactive simulation and visualization of 3D embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Combining ontologies and 3D models enables a declarative description of different embryological models that capture the complexity of human developmental anatomy. Visualizing embryos with 3D geometric models and their animated deformations perhaps paves the way towards some kind of hypothesis-driven application. These can also be used to assist the learning process of this complex knowledge. AVAILABILITY: http://www.mycorporisfabrica.org/.
Authors: Nestor Milyaev; David Osumi-Sutherland; Simon Reeve; Nicholas Burton; Richard A Baldock; J Douglas Armstrong Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Daniel L Rubin; Olivier Dameron; Yasser Bashir; David Grossman; Parvati Dev; Mark A Musen Journal: Artif Intell Med Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 5.326
Authors: R M Brune; J B Bard; C Dubreuil; E Guest; W Hill; M Kaufman; M Stark; D Davidson; R A Baldock Journal: Dev Biol Date: 1999-12-15 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: M Ringwald; R Baldock; J Bard; M Kaufman; J T Eppig; J E Richardson; J H Nadeau; D Davidson Journal: Science Date: 1994-09-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Lynn Marie Schriml; Cesar Arze; Suvarna Nadendla; Yu-Wei Wayne Chang; Mark Mazaitis; Victor Felix; Gang Feng; Warren Alden Kibbe Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2011-11-12 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Christopher J Mungall; Carlo Torniai; Georgios V Gkoutos; Suzanna E Lewis; Melissa A Haendel Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Amy Hunter; Matthew H Kaufman; Angus McKay; Richard Baldock; Martin W Simmen; Jonathan B L Bard Journal: J Anat Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 2.610