| Literature DB >> 26413078 |
Yafeng Gou1, Jianhua Li1, Junbao Zhu1, Wanyun Xu1, Jianfeng Gao1.
Abstract
A new inulinase-producing strain was isolated from rhizosphere soils of Jerusalem artichoke collected from Shihezi (Xinjiang, China) using Jerusalem artichoke power (JAP) as sole carbon source. It was identified as an Aspergillus niger strain by analysis of 16S rRNA. To improve inulinase production, this fungus was subjected to mutagenesis induced by (60)Co γ-irradiation. A genetically stable mutant (designated E12) was obtained and it showed 2.7-fold higher inulinase activity (128 U/mL) than the parental strain in the supernatant of a submerged culture. Sequential methodology was used to optimize the inulinase production of stain E12. A screening trial was first performed using Plackett-Burman design and variables with statistically significant effects on inulinase bio-production were identified. These significant factors were further optimized by central composite design experiments and response surface methodology. Finally, it was found that the maximum inulinase production (185 U/mL) could be achieved under the optimized conditions namely pH 7.0, yeast extract concentration of 5.0 g/L, JAP concentration of 66.5 g/L, peptone concentration of 29.1 g/L, solution volume of 49.4 mL in 250-mL shake flasks, agitation speed of 180 rpm, and fermentation time of 60 h. The yield of inulinase under optimized culture conditions was approximately 1.4-fold of that obtained by using basal culture medium. These findings are of significance for the potential industrial application of the mutant E12.Entities:
Keywords: central composite design; ethanol fermentation; inulin; inulinase; response surface methodology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26413078 PMCID: PMC4568880 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838246320140918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
The Plackett-Burman design for screening the variables, and the statistical analysis of variables
| Factor | Variable | Low level (−1) | High level (1) | F value | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAP (g/L) | X1 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 23.24 | 0.0170 |
| pH | X2 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 0.65 | 0.4790 |
| Yeast extract (g/L) | X3 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 4.78 | 0.1168 |
| Fermentation time (h) | X5 | 60 | 96 | 0.33 | 0.6080 |
| Peptone (g/L) | X6 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 50.43 | 0.0057 |
| Temperature (°C) | X7 | 27 | 29 | 0.48 | 0.5385 |
| Solution volume (mL) | X9 | 40 | 60 | 25.97 | 0.0146 |
| Inoculation size (%) | X10 | 4 | 6 | 0.14 | 0.7352 |
| Dummy variable | X4, X8, X11 | −1 | 1 | - | - |
| - | Model | - | - | 13.25 | 0.0285 |
Significant at 95% confidence degree (p < 0.05).
Extremely significant level at 99% confidence degree (p < 0.01).
Range of variation of the independent factors used in the central composite design
| Variable | Code | Level of variation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| −1.68 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 1.68 | ||
| JAP (g/L) | A | 53.2 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 80.0 | 86.8 |
| Peptone (g/L) | B | 9.9 | 15.0 | 22.5 | 30.0 | 35.1 |
| Solution volume (mL) | C | 33.2 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 66.8 |
Figure 1Colony number of surviving cells grown in selecting medium agar plates after two days of incubation under different irradiation doses. Error bars represent the standard error associated with triplicate experiments. A single colony of mutant with a diameter ≥ 3.3 cm, ≤ 2.7 cm, or between 2.7 and 3.3 cm was considered a forward-, negative- or non-mutation strain, respectively
Figure 2Inulinase yield of parental strain G-60 and mutants after cultivation at 28 °C and 180 rpm for 60 h using the fermentation medium
The design and results of Plackett-Burman design
| No. | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | Inulinase yield (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 125 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 91.0 |
| 3 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 156 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 110 |
| 5 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 77.4 |
| 6 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 133 |
| 7 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 93.3 |
| 8 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 122 |
| 9 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 107 |
| 10 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 104 |
| 11 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 115 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 126 |
The designs and results of path of steepest ascent
| No. | JAP (g/L) | Peptone (g/L) | Solution volume (mL) | Inulinase yield (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50.0 | 12.5 | 60 | 97.0 |
| 2 | 60.0 | 17.5 | 55 | 138 |
| 3 | 70.0 | 22.5 | 50 | 166 |
| 4 | 80.0 | 27.5 | 45 | 120 |
| 5 | 90.0 | 32.5 | 40 | 104 |
| 6 | 100.0 | 37.5 | 35 | 81.7 |
The designs and results of central composite design
| No. | JAP (A) | Peptone (B) | Solution volume (C) | Inulinase yield (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 151 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 166 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 166 |
| 4 | 1.68 | 0 | 0 | 118 |
| 5 | 0 | −1.68 | 0 | 131 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 166 |
| 7 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 81.1 |
| 8 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 137 |
| 9 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 117 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 166 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | −1.68 | 113 |
| 12 | −1.68 | 0 | 0 | 152 |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 109 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 166 |
| 15 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 144 |
| 16 | 0 | 1.68 | 0 | 137 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 166 |
| 18 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 138 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 1.68 | 127 |
| 20 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 132 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for regression of central composite design
| Variance origin |
| p value |
|---|---|---|
| A | 6.97 | 0.0247 |
| B | 0.094 | 0.8295 |
| C | 0.74 | 0.4099 |
| A2 | 16.55 | 0.0023 |
| B2 | 26.17 | 0.0005 |
| C2 | 24.34 | 0.0006 |
| AB | 2.18 | 0.1708 |
| AC | 0.041 | 0.8434 |
| BC | 3.20 | 0.1040 |
| Model | 7.70 | 0.0013 |
| First term | 0.58 | 0.6375 |
| Quadratic term | 18.71 | 0.0002 |
| Interaction term | 0.35 | 0.7864 |
| Lack of fit | 2.22 | 0.2007 |
Significant at 95% confidence degree (p < 0.05).
Extremely significant level at 99% confidence degree (p < 0.01).
Figure 3The response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot showing the effects of JAP and peptone on inulinase production by mutant E12. Solution volume level, 50.0 mL
Figure 4The response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot showing the effects of JAP and solution volume on inulinase production by mutant E12. Peptone level, 22.5 g/L
Figure 5The response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot showing the effects of peptone and solution volume on inulinase production by mutant E12. JAP level, 70.0 g/L