| Literature DB >> 26413061 |
Thiago José de Souza Barboza1, Andréa Fonseca Ferreira2, Ana Claudia de Paula Rosa Ignacio2, Norma Albarello1.
Abstract
Brazilian flora includes numerous species of medicinal importance that can be used to develop new drugs. Plant tissue culture offers strategies for conservation and use of these species allowing continuous production of plants and bioactive substances. Annona mucosa has produced substances such as acetogenins and alkaloids that exhibit antimicrobial activities. The widespread use of antibiotics has led to an increase in multidrug-resistant bacteria, which represents a serious risk of infection. In view of this problem, the aim of this work was to evaluate the antibacterial potential of extracts of A. mucosa obtained by in vitro techniques and also cultured under in vivo conditions. Segments from seedlings were inoculated onto different culture media containing the auxin picloram and the cytokinin kinetin at different concentrations. The calluses obtained were used to produce cell suspension cultures. The materials were subjected to methanol extraction and subsequent fractionation in hexane and dichloromethane. The antimicrobial activity against 20 strains of clinical relevance was evaluated by the macrodilution method at minimum inhibitory and minimum bactericidal concentrations. The extracts showed selective antimicrobial activity, inhibiting the growth of Streptococcus pyogenes and Bacillus thuringiensis at different concentrations. The plant tissue culture methods produced plant materials with antibacterial properties, as well as in vivo grown plants. The antibacterial activity of material obtained through biotechnological procedures of A. mucosa is reported here for the first time.Entities:
Keywords: Annonaceae; antibacterial properties; callus cultures; cell suspension cultures; medicinal plant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26413061 PMCID: PMC4568882 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838246320140468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Bacterial strains used for the evaluation of antibacterial potential of A. mucosa extracts
| Gram-positive | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Species | Strains |
|
| ATCC 33679 |
|
| ATCC 29212 |
|
| ATCC 25923 |
|
| ATCC 15305 |
|
| ATCC 27851 |
|
| ATCC 8668 |
|
| |
| Gram-negative | |
|
| |
| Species | Strains |
|
| |
|
| ATCC 15468 |
|
| ATCC 7966 |
|
| ATCC 33907 |
|
| ATCC 12241 |
|
| EAEC 17-2 |
|
| ATCC 25922 |
|
| ATCC 35218 |
|
| C600 |
|
| HB 101 |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | ATCC 700603 |
|
| ATCC 27853 |
|
| C20 |
|
| 7145 |
|
| ATCC 25931 |
Antimicrobial activity against 20 bacterial strains from methanol extracts of A. mucosa obtained by in vivoand in vitro conditions at 500 μg.mL−1, determined by Agar Dilution Method assay
| Strains | Extracts | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||
| S | S1 | S2 | L | L1 | L2 | CH | CL | CCS | CCS1 | CCS2 | |
| 1 - | - | R | R | R | - | - | R | - | - | - | R |
| 2 - | - | - | - | - | - | I | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 - | - | - | - | - | - | I | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 - | - | - | - | - | - | I | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 - | - | - | - | - | - | I | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 - | - | - | - | - | - | I | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 - | - | - | - | - | - | I | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 - | - | - | - | - | - | I | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 - | - | - | - | R | - | - | - | IH | IH | - | R |
| 10 - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 11 - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 14 - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | R | - | - | - |
| 15 - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 16 - | IH | - | R | IH | R | IH | - | - | - | - | - |
| 17 - | - | - | - | - | - | I | - | - | - | - | - |
| 18 - | - | - | - | R | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 19 - | - | - | - | - | - | I | - | - | - | - | - |
| 20 - | - | - | - | - | - | I | - | - | - | - | - |
S: Crude methanol extract of stem; S1: hexane fraction; S2: dichloromethane fraction; L: Crude methanol extract of leaf; L1: hexane fraction; L2: dichloromethane fraction; CH: Crude methanol extract of callus from hypocotyl; CL: Crude methanol extract of callus from leaves; CCS: Crude methanol extract of cell suspension culture; CCS1: hexane fraction; CCS2: dichloromethane fraction.
I = increase of growth; R = reduction; IH = inhibition; Trace = growth is similar of the control in Mueller-Hinton Agar without extract.
Phytochemical analysis of methanolic extracts of Annona mucosa cultivated in vivo and obtained by plant tissue culture techniques
| Extracts | Alkaloids | Flavonoids | Phenols | Tanins | Saponins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | + | + | + | + | + |
| Steam | + | + | − | − | − |
| Callus from leaves | + | + | + | + | − |
| Callus from hypocotyls | + | + | − | + | − |
| Cell suspension culture | + | − | − | − | − |
(+) presence; (−) absence.
Tests with the reactive of Meyer and Bouchardat.
Tests for flavone, flavonol and xanthone.