| Literature DB >> 26413053 |
Anusree V Nair1, Neetha Joseph2, Kiran Krishna3, K G Sneha3, Neenu Tom3, Kamlesh Jangid2, Shanta Nair4.
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous Gram-negative bacterium having a versatile metabolic potential and great ecological and clinical significance. The geographical distribution of P. aeruginosahas revealed the existence of an unbiased genetic arrangement in terrestrial isolates. In contrast, there are very few reports about P. aeruginosa strains from marine environments. The present work was aimed at studying the distribution of P. aeruginosa in coastal waters along the Indian Peninsula and understanding the environmental influence on genotypic, metabolic and phenotypic characteristics by comparing marine and clinical isolates. Of the 785 marine isolates obtained on selective media, only 32 (~4.1%) were identified as P. aeruginosa, based on their fatty acid methyl ester profiles. A low Euclidian distance value (< 2.5) obtained from chemotaxonomic analysis suggested that all the environmental (coastal and marine) isolates originated from a single species. While UPGMA analyses of AP-PCR and phenotypic profiles separated the environmental and clinical isolates, fatty acid biotyping showed overlapping between most clinical and environmental isolates. Our study revealed the genetic diversity among different environmental isolates of P. aeruginosa. While biogeographical separation was not evident based solely on phenotypic and metabolic typing, genomic and metatranscriptomic studies are more likely to show differences between these isolates. Thus, newer and more insightful methods are required to understand the ecological distribution of this complex group of bacteria.Entities:
Keywords: FAME profiling; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; arbitrarily primed PCR; biogeography; environmental distribution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26413053 PMCID: PMC4568853 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838246320140502
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Figure 1Locations of the sample collection sites along the Indian coast
Location, source, number and isolate name of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
| Origin | Location | Source | Hydrographic characteristics | Total number of isolates | Number of isolates at particular station | Isolate identity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| pH | Salinity (‰) | Temperature (°C) | ||||||
| Marine | Andaman | Water | 8 | 35 | 28 | 7 | 7 | A1 – A7 |
| Coastal | Mumbai | Water | 8.4 | 36 | 26 | 25 | 8 | M1 – M8 |
| Kakinada | Water | 7.7 | 34 | 31 | 10 | K1 – K10 | ||
| Cochin | Water | 7.8 | 35 | 30 | 7 | C1 – C7 | ||
| Clinical | Hospital | Urine | NA | NA | NA | 7 | 2 | CLN2 & CLN5 |
| Pus | NA | NA | NA | 5 | CLN1, CLN3, CLN4, CLN6 & CLN7 | |||
| Reference | Outer ear infection | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 1 | MTCC 1688 | |
NA – Not Applicable.
Details of total cellular fatty acid composition (%) of the analysed isolates
| Locations | Clinical isolates | Andaman | Kakinada | Mumbai | Cochin | Reference strain | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown 11.799 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 |
| C11:0 3OH | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 |
| SF2 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 |
| C16:1 ω5c | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.13 | 0.04 |
| C18:1 ω9c | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0 | 0.16 | 0.08 |
| Unknown 12.484 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0 | 0.11 |
| C10:0 | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0 | 0.16 |
| C17:0 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 0.19 |
| C17:1 ω8c | 0.38 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.24 |
| C15:0 | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.35 |
| C12:1 3OH | 0.54 | 0.35 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.39 | 0 | 0.40 |
| C17:0 CYCLO | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.74 | 0.59 | 0.58 |
| C14:0 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.86 | 0.64 |
| C18:0 | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.63 | 0.75 |
| C19:0 CYCLO ω8c | 0.7 | 0.86 | 0.6 | 0.58 | 1.15 | 0.99 | 0.81 |
| C10:0 3OH | 2.86 | 2.72 | 3 | 1.52 | 2.56 | 2.43 | 2.52 |
| C12:0 | 2.77 | 2.8 | 2.95 | 2.78 | 2.87 | 3.2 | 2.90 |
| C12:0 3OH | 3.91 | 3.84 | 4.04 | 4.13 | 3.97 | 3.84 | 3.96 |
| C12:0 2OH | 4.44 | 4.07 | 4.22 | 4.28 | 4.24 | 4.31 | 4.26 |
| SF3 | 13.66 | 14.17 | 12.99 | 13.7 | 13.78 | 16.5 | 14.13 |
| C16:0 | 26.52 | 25.33 | 26.73 | 26.28 | 26.32 | 24.16 | 25.89 |
| C18:1 ω7c | 41.15 | 42.89 | 41.81 | 43 | 41.42 | 41.33 | 41.93 |
Summed features are groups of two or three fatty acids that cannot be separated by GC with the MIDI system.
Summed Feature 2 (SF2) comprised of C16:1 ISO I and/or C14:0 3OH.
Summed Feature 3 (SF3) comprised of C15:0 ISO 2OH and/or C16:1 ω7c.
Figure 2Dendrogram based on the fatty acid profiles of the P. aeruginosa isolates. M, Mumbai; C, Cochin; K, Kakinada; A, Andaman; CLN, clinical isolates. F1–F8 indicate the clusters formed by the isolates with the threshold ED value of 2.5, based on their FAME profiles
Figure 3An UPGMA dendrogram based on the AP-PCR banding patterns of the P. aeruginosa isolates (abbreviations as in Figure 2). R1–R9 are the clusters formed based on the RAPD pattern at the threshold level of 50% similarity
Pyocyanin, Protease and Heamolysin activity of P. aeruginosa isolates collected from various stations
| Station | Pyocyanin production (μg/mL) | Protease (zone in mm) | Haemolysin (zone in mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andaman (n = 7) | 0.29a ± 0.02 | 20.43a ± 1.25 | 11.14a ± 0.52 |
| Cochin (n = 7) | 1.41b ± 0.08 | 13.57b ± 0.62 | 11.14a ± 0.80 |
| Kakinada (n = 10) | 0.24a ± 0.01 | 19.40ac ± 0.85 | 17.50bd ± 0.77 |
| Mumbai (n = 8) | 0.50ac ± 0.01 | 14.13bd ± 0.96 | 21.88c ± 1.06 |
| Clinical isolates (n = 7) | 0.79c ± 0.03 | 14.71bd ± 1.10 | 14.29ab ± 0.67 |
| Reference strain (n = 1) | 0.22a ± 0.01 | 17.00cd ± 0.13 | 20.00dc ± 0.32 |
The data for each isolate are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The column values with different letters (a–d) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Dendrogram based on the phenotypic patterns of the P. aeruginosa strains. The dendrogram was constructed using the PRIMER-5 software (abbreviations as in Figure 2). P1–P4 are the clusters formed at a similarity level above 95%