Literature DB >> 26413025

Use of a Vascular Sheath in the Axillary Artery as an Alternative Access Approach for Placing an Impella 5.0 Device.

Ankur S Shah, Richard Lee, Dawn S Hui, Michael J Lim, Robert H Neumayr, Joshua M Stolker.   

Abstract

Many patients who are in cardiogenic shock need mechanical support for clinical stabilization after acute insults such as myocardial infarction. However, the placement of advanced devices can be hindered by anatomic constraints or the physiologic sequelae of shock, as we describe in this report. A 67-year-old woman with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and extensive chest-wall scarring from previous defibrillator implantations presented with myocardial infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock. The patient's vascular anatomy and prior surgery precluded conventional percutaneous implantation of an Impella 5.0 ventricular support device. We delivered the Impella device through the patient's tortuous, vasoconstricted axillary artery with use of a vascular sheath and other percutaneous techniques. The success of this approach suggests that combining the expertise of cardiologists and cardiovascular surgeons can improve the outcomes of patients with complex anatomic issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angioplasty, balloon, coronary/instrumentation/methods; coronary artery disease/complications/therapy; equipment design; extremities/blood supply; heart-assist devices; knowledge bases; myocardial infarction/complications; percutaneous coronary intervention/methods; shock, cardiogenic/surgery; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26413025      PMCID: PMC4567110          DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  9 in total

1.  GuideLiner catheter facilitated PCI--a novel device with multiple applications.

Authors:  Ashish Pershad; Victor Sein; Nathan Laufer
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.022

Review 2.  2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Michael J Mack; Sanjay Kaul; Arvind Agnihotri; Karen P Alexander; Steven R Bailey; John H Calhoon; Blase A Carabello; Milind Y Desai; Fred H Edwards; Gary S Francis; Timothy J Gardner; A Pieter Kappetein; Jane A Linderbaum; Chirojit Mukherjee; Debabrata Mukherjee; Catherine M Otto; Carlos E Ruiz; Ralph L Sacco; Donnette Smith; James D Thomas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  The right axillary artery approach for the Impella Recover LP 5.0 microaxial pump.

Authors:  Thomas Sassard; Aurelien Scalabre; Eric Bonnefoy; Ingrid Sanchez; Fadi Farhat; Olivier Jegaden
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study.

Authors:  William W O'Neill; Neal S Kleiman; Jeffrey Moses; Jose P S Henriques; Simon Dixon; Joseph Massaro; Igor Palacios; Brijeshwar Maini; Suresh Mulukutla; Vladimír Dzavík; Jeffrey Popma; Pamela S Douglas; Magnus Ohman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Intra-aortic balloon pump placement following aorto-iliac angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  William R Colyer; Mark W Burket; Gary M Ansel; Stephen R Ramee; Robert L Minor; C Michael Gibson; Christopher J Cooper
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Miroslaw Ferenc; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Jörg Hausleiter; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Jörg Fuhrmann; Michael Böhm; Henning Ebelt; Steffen Schneider; Gerhard Schuler; Karl Werdan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Temporary (short-term) percutaneous left ventricular assist device (Tandem Heart) in a patient with STEMI, multivessel coronary artery disease, cardiogenic shock and severe peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Petr Neuzil; Petr Kmonicek; Jan Skoda; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  Acute Card Care       Date:  2009

8.  A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience.

Authors:  Simon R Dixon; José P S Henriques; Laura Mauri; Krischan Sjauw; Andrew Civitello; Biswajit Kar; Pranav Loyalka; Frederic S Resnic; Paul Teirstein; Raj Makkar; Igor F Palacios; Michael Collins; Jeffrey Moses; Karim Benali; William W O'Neill
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Melchior Seyfarth; Dirk Sibbing; Iris Bauer; Georg Fröhlich; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Robert Byrne; Josef Dirschinger; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Novel method for transaxillary Impella 5.0 implantation in patients with tortuous arterial anatomy.

Authors:  Bryant Fisher; Conrad Smith; Ibrahim Sultan; Arman Kilic
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-07-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.