OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a quality improvement (QI) initiative would result in more timely assessment and treatment of acute sickle cell-related pain for pediatric patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) treated in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We created and implemented a protocol for SCD pain management in the ED with the goals of improving (1) mean time from triage to first analgesic dose; (2) percentage of patients that received their first analgesic dose within 30 minutes of triage, and (3) percentage of patients who had pain assessment performed within 30 minutes of triage and who were re-assessed within 30 minutes after the first analgesic dose. RESULTS: Significant improvements were achieved between baseline (55 patient visits) and post order set implementation (165 visits) in time from triage to administration of first analgesic (decreased from 89.9 ± 50.5 to 35.2 ± 22.8 minutes, P < 0.001); percentage of patient visits receiving pain medications within 30 minutes of triage (from 7% to 53%, P < 0.001); percentage of patient visits assessed within 30 minutes of triage (from 64% to 99.4%, P < 0.001); and percentage of patient visits re-assessed within 30 minutes of initial analgesic (from 54% to 86%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a QI initiative in the ED led to expeditious care for pediatric patients with SCD presenting with pain. A QI framework provided us with unique challenges but also invaluable lessons as we address our objective of decreasing the quality gap in SCD medical care.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a quality improvement (QI) initiative would result in more timely assessment and treatment of acute sickle cell-related pain for pediatric patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) treated in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We created and implemented a protocol for SCD pain management in the ED with the goals of improving (1) mean time from triage to first analgesic dose; (2) percentage of patients that received their first analgesic dose within 30 minutes of triage, and (3) percentage of patients who had pain assessment performed within 30 minutes of triage and who were re-assessed within 30 minutes after the first analgesic dose. RESULTS: Significant improvements were achieved between baseline (55 patient visits) and post order set implementation (165 visits) in time from triage to administration of first analgesic (decreased from 89.9 ± 50.5 to 35.2 ± 22.8 minutes, P < 0.001); percentage of patient visits receiving pain medications within 30 minutes of triage (from 7% to 53%, P < 0.001); percentage of patient visits assessed within 30 minutes of triage (from 64% to 99.4%, P < 0.001); and percentage of patient visits re-assessed within 30 minutes of initial analgesic (from 54% to 86%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a QI initiative in the ED led to expeditious care for pediatric patients with SCD presenting with pain. A QI framework provided us with unique challenges but also invaluable lessons as we address our objective of decreasing the quality gap in SCD medical care.
Authors: David C Rees; Ade D Olujohungbe; Norman E Parker; Adrian D Stephens; Paul Telfer; Josh Wright Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Matthew P Lazio; Heather H Costello; D Mark Courtney; Zoran Martinovich; Randall Myers; Amy Zosel; Paula Tanabe Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Hussain R Yusuf; Hani K Atrash; Scott D Grosse; Christopher S Parker; Althea M Grant Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Wally R Smith; Lynne T Penberthy; Viktor E Bovbjerg; Donna K McClish; John D Roberts; Bassam Dahman; Imoigele P Aisiku; James L Levenson; Susan D Roseff Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 25.391