| Literature DB >> 26412952 |
Yan Zhang1, Hideyo Inouye1, Lin Yang2, Michael E Himmel3, Melvin Tucker3, Lee Makowski4.
Abstract
Cellulose is an attractive candidate as a feedstock for sustainable bioenergy because of its global abundance. Pretreatment of biomass has significant influence on the chemical availability of cellulose locked in recalcitrant microfibrils. Optimizing pretreatment depends on an understanding of its impact on the microscale and nanoscale molecular architecture. X-ray scattering experiments have been performed on native and pre-treated maize stover and models of cellulose architecture have been derived from these data. Ultra small-angle, very small-angle and small-angle X-ray scattering (USAXS, VSAXS and SAXS) probe three different levels of architectural scale. USAXS and SAXS have been used to study cellulose at two distinct length scales, modeling the fibrils as ~30 Å diameter rods packed into ~0.14 μm diameter bundles. VSAXS is sensitive to structural features at length scales between these two extremes. Detailed analysis of diffraction patterns from untreated and pretreated maize using cylindrical Guinier plots and the derivatives of these plots reveals the presence of substructures within the ~0.14 μm diameter bundles that correspond to grouping of cellulose approximately 30 nm in diameter. These sub-structures are resilient to dilute acid pretreatments but are sensitive to pretreatment when iron sulfate is added. These results provide evidence of the hierarchical arrangement of cellulose at three length scales and the evolution of these arrangements during pre-treatments.Entities:
Keywords: Cellulose; Guinier analysis; Hierarchical architecture; Multi-Angle X-ray scattering
Year: 2015 PMID: 26412952 PMCID: PMC4579859 DOI: 10.1007/s10570-015-0592-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cellulose (Lond) ISSN: 0969-0239 Impact factor: 5.044
Fig. 1a Computationally generated scattering intensities from solid cylinders. b Gunier plot of ln[qI(q)] versus q2. c Linear fit to the low-angle region of Guinier plot
Calculated Rxc and radius of simulated intensities from cylinders
| (r0,σ) (Å) | Rxc (Å) | r (Å) | Difference between r0 and r (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | (600, 60) | 434.6 | 614.6 | 2.4 |
| 2 | (600, 120) | 458.6 | 648.4 | 8.1 |
| 3 | (600, 180) | 475.5 | 672.4 | 12.1 |
| 4 | (600, 240) | 483.9 | 684.3 | 14.1 |
Fig. 2a First order (left) and second order (right) derivative of Guinier plot in noise-free Intensity using numerical differentiation. b First order (left) and second order (right) derivative of Gunier plot with Gaussian noise added to the intensity and using numerical differentiation. c First order (left) and second order (right) derivative of Guinier plot with Gaussian noise added to the intensity and using Total-Variation Regularization method
Fig. 3a Ultra small-angel X-ray diffraction pattern. b Very small-angle X-ray diffraction pattern. c Small-angle X-ray diffraction pattern. d Combined scattering Intensities of three samples in three length scale
Fig. 4a Second order derivatives of Guinier plot on experimental data. b Linear fit to Guinier plot in region 1. c Linear fit to Gunier plot in region 2. d Linear fit to Guinier plot in region 3
Calculated Rxc and radius of scattering intensities among control, acid treated and acid plus iron treated samples
| Rxc (Å) | Diameters (Å) | |
|---|---|---|
| USAXS control | 523.5 | 1481.0 |
| USAXS acid | 529.3 | 1497.2 |
| USAXS iron | 536.3 | 1517.2 |
| VSAXS control | 102.2 | 289.0 |
| VSAXS acid | 105.9 | 299.6 |
| VSAXS iron | 92.1 | 260.6 |
| SAXS control | 8.2 | 23.2 |
| SAXS acid | 5.3 | 15.04 |
| SAXS iron | 10.7 | 30.4 |