Literature DB >> 26412883

Background parenchymal enhancement in preoperative breast MRI.

Satoko Kohara1, Satoko Ishigaki1, Hiroko Satake1, Akiko Kawamura1, Hisashi Kawai1, Toyone Kikumori2, Shinji Naganawa1.   

Abstract

We aimed to assess the influence of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on surgical planning performed using preoperative MRI for breast cancer evaluation. Between January 2009 and December 2010, 91 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients (mean age, 55.5 years; range, 30-88 years) who underwent preoperative bilateral breast MRI followed by planned breast conservation therapy were retrospectively enrolled. MRI was performed to assess the tumor extent in addition to mammography and breast ultrasonography. BPE in the contralateral normal breast MRI at the early dynamic phase was visually classified as follows: minimal (n=49), mild (n=27), moderate (n=7), and marked (n=8). The correlations between the BPE grade and age, menopausal status, index tumor size, changes in surgical management based on MRI results, positive predictive value (PPV) of MRI, and surgical margins were assessed. Patients in the strong BPE groups were significantly younger (p=0.002) and generally premenopausal (p<0.001). Surgical treatment was not changed in 67 cases (73.6%), while extended excision and mastectomy were performed in 12 cases (13.2%), each based on additional lesions on MRI. Six of 79 (7.6%) patients who underwent breast conservation therapy had tumor-positive resection margins. In cases where surgical management was changed, the PPV for MRI-detected foci was high in the minimal (91.7%) and mild groups (66.7%), and 0% in the moderate and marked groups (p=0.002). Strong BPE causes false-positive MRI findings and may lead to overly extensive surgery, whereas MRI may be beneficial in select patients with weak BPE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  background parenchymal enhancement; breast cancer; preoperative MRI

Year:  2015        PMID: 26412883      PMCID: PMC4574324     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci        ISSN: 0027-7622            Impact factor:   1.131


  12 in total

Review 1.  The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon.

Authors:  Virginia Molleran; Mary C Mahoney
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 2.  The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice.

Authors:  Christiane Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer?

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency.

Authors:  C K Kuhl; H B Bieling; J Gieseke; B P Kreft; T Sommer; G Lutterbey; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up.

Authors:  Niamh M Hambly; Laura Liberman; D David Dershaw; Sandra Brennan; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lindsay Turnbull; Sarah Brown; Ian Harvey; Catherine Olivier; Phil Drew; Vicky Napp; Andrew Hanby; Julia Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; D David Dershaw; Andrea F Abramson; Lee K Tan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Does pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging in addition to mammography and breast ultrasonography change the operative management of breast carcinoma?

Authors:  Hye In Lim; Jae Hyuck Choi; Jung-Hyun Yang; Boo-Kyung Han; Jeong Eon Lee; Se-Kyung Lee; Wan Wook Kim; Sangmin Kim; Jee Soo Kim; Jung-Han Kim; Jun-Ho Choe; Eun Yoon Cho; Seok Seon Kang; Jung Hee Shin; Eun Young Ko; Sang Wook Kim; Seok Jin Nam
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Stefano Ciatto; Petra Macaskill; Sarah J Lord; Ruth M Warren; J Michael Dixon; Les Irwig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bianca Bignotti; Alessio Signori; Francesca Valdora; Federica Rossi; Massimo Calabrese; Manuela Durando; Giovanna Mariscotto; Alberto Tagliafico
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.