Literature DB >> 26412846

Reassurance during low back pain consultations with GPs: a qualitative study.

Nicola Holt1, Tamar Pincus1, Steven Vogel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reassurance is commonly recommended in guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care, although it is poorly defined, and what it means to patients remains unknown. AIM: To explore how patients with low back pain perceive practitioners' reassuring behaviours during consultations. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Qualitative study undertaken with patients from nine GP surgeries in Northamptonshire, England.
METHOD: Twenty-three patients who had recently consulted for non-specific low back pain were recruited from general practice. Semi-structured interviews explored what they had found reassuring during their consultations and the effect of such reassurance since their consultations. Interview transcripts were analysed using the thematic framework method.
RESULTS: Patients each brought to their consultations experiences, beliefs, expectations, and concerns that they wanted the doctor to hear and understand. They were reassured implicitly when it seemed the doctor was taking them seriously and wanted to help; this was also achieved through relationship building and feeling that the GP was readily available to them. However, it was only explicit, informational reassurance that directly addressed patients' concerns by providing them with explanations ruling out serious disease, and helped them to understand and cope with their pain.
CONCLUSION: The themes of implicit and explicit reassurance uncovered here correspond with ideas of affective and cognitive reassurance, respectively. Although the findings support the use of information and education to alleviate concerns, the role of implicit reassurance through relationship building and empathy remains less clear. The impact of these behaviours on outcomes should form a priority for future research. © British Journal of General Practice 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  back pain; general practice; low back pain; physician–patient relations

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26412846      PMCID: PMC4582882          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X686953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  17 in total

1.  The economic burden of back pain in the UK.

Authors:  N Maniadakis; A Gray
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Patient education and the consultation: the importance of lay beliefs.

Authors:  J Donovan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  Bart W Koes; Maurits van Tulder; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Luciana G Macedo; James McAuley; Chris Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  Maurits van Tulder; Annette Becker; Trudy Bekkering; Alan Breen; Maria Teresa Gil del Real; Allen Hutchinson; Bart Koes; Even Laerum; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Medical reassurance and patients' responses.

Authors:  P Coia; S Morley
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  What is "the good back-consultation"? A combined qualitative and quantitative study of chronic low back pain patients' interaction with and perceptions of consultations with specialists.

Authors:  Even Laerum; Aage Indahl; Jan Sture Skouen
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Qualitative study of interpretation of reassurance among patients attending rheumatology clinics: "just a touch of arthritis, doctor?".

Authors:  J L Donovan; D R Blake
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-26

8.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis.

Authors:  Liset H M Pengel; Robert D Herbert; Chris G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-09

Review 10.  A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Marienke van Middelkoop; Sidney M Rubinstein; Ton Kuijpers; Arianne P Verhagen; Raymond Ostelo; Bart W Koes; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  13 in total

1.  Patients' use of physical therapy for lower back pain: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Jason A Sharpe; Anne Thackeray; Julie M Fritz; Brook I Martin; John Magel; Megan E Vanneman
Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  Temporal stability of self-reported visual back pain trajectories.

Authors:  Casper Glissmann Nim; Alice Kongsted; Aron Downie; Werner Vach
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 3.  The Global Spine Care Initiative: a narrative review of psychological and social issues in back pain in low- and middle-income communities.

Authors:  Christine Cedraschi; Margareta Nordin; Scott Haldeman; Kristi Randhawa; Deborah Kopansky-Giles; Claire D Johnson; Roger Chou; Eric L Hurwitz; Pierre Côté
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Socio-Cultural Factors and Experience of Chronic Low Back Pain: a Spanish and Brazilian Patients' Perspective. A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Daiana Priscila Rodrigues-de-Souza; Domingo Palacios-Ceña; Lourdes Moro-Gutiérrez; Paula Rezende Camargo; Tania Fátima Salvini; Francisco Alburquerque-Sendín
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Developing and testing a measure of consultation-based reassurance for people with low back pain in primary care: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nicola Holt; Tamar Pincus
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Testing a Model of Consultation-based Reassurance and Back Pain Outcomes With Psychological Risk as Moderator: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nicola Holt; Gemma Mansell; Jonathan C Hill; Tamar Pincus
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Building trust and rapport early in the new doctor-patient relationship: a longitudinal qualitative study.

Authors:  Bich N Dang; Robert A Westbrook; Sarah M Njue; Thomas P Giordano
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Patients' perceived needs for medical services for non-specific low back pain: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Louisa Chou; Tom A Ranger; Waruna Peiris; Flavia M Cicuttini; Donna M Urquhart; Kaye Sullivan; Maheeka Seneviwickrama; Andrew M Briggs; Anita E Wluka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  A Cultural Shift Away from Cognitive-behavioral Empathy.

Authors:  James B Fowler; Yasir R Khan; Glenn M Fischberg; Deependra Mahato
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-11-17

10.  The association between believing staying active is beneficial and achieving a clinically relevant functional improvement after 52 weeks: a prospective cohort study of patients with chronic low back pain in secondary care.

Authors:  Allan Riis; Emma Louise Karran; Janus Laust Thomsen; Anette Jørgensen; Søren Holst; Nanna Rolving
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.