OBJECTIVE: Maternal mortality rates have decreased globally but remain off track for Millennium Development Goals. Good-quality delivery care is one recognised strategy to address this gap. This study examines the role of the private (non-public) sector in providing delivery care and compares the equity and quality of the sectors. METHODS: The most recent Demographic and Health Survey (2000-2013) for 57 countries was used to analyse delivery care for most recent birth among >330 000 women. Wealth quintiles were used for equity analysis; skilled birth attendant (SBA) and Caesarean section rates served as proxies for quality of care in cross-sectoral comparisons. RESULTS: The proportion of women who used appropriate delivery care (non-facility with a SBA or facility-based births) varied across regions (49-84%), but wealth-related inequalities were seen in both sectors in all regions. One-fifth of all deliveries occurred in the private sector. Overall, 36% of deliveries with appropriate care occurred in the private sector, ranging from 9% to 46% across regions. The presence of a SBA was comparable between sectors (≥93%) in all regions. In every region, Caesarean section rate was higher in the private compared to public sector. The private sector provided between 13% (Latin America) and 66% (Asia) of Caesarean section deliveries. CONCLUSION: This study is the most comprehensive assessment to date of coverage, equity and quality indicators of delivery care by sector. The private sector provided a substantial proportion of delivery care in low- and middle-income countries. Further research is necessary to better understand this heterogeneous group of providers and their potential to equitably increase the coverage of good-quality intrapartum care.
OBJECTIVE: Maternal mortality rates have decreased globally but remain off track for Millennium Development Goals. Good-quality delivery care is one recognised strategy to address this gap. This study examines the role of the private (non-public) sector in providing delivery care and compares the equity and quality of the sectors. METHODS: The most recent Demographic and Health Survey (2000-2013) for 57 countries was used to analyse delivery care for most recent birth among >330 000 women. Wealth quintiles were used for equity analysis; skilled birth attendant (SBA) and Caesarean section rates served as proxies for quality of care in cross-sectoral comparisons. RESULTS: The proportion of women who used appropriate delivery care (non-facility with a SBA or facility-based births) varied across regions (49-84%), but wealth-related inequalities were seen in both sectors in all regions. One-fifth of all deliveries occurred in the private sector. Overall, 36% of deliveries with appropriate care occurred in the private sector, ranging from 9% to 46% across regions. The presence of a SBA was comparable between sectors (≥93%) in all regions. In every region, Caesarean section rate was higher in the private compared to public sector. The private sector provided between 13% (Latin America) and 66% (Asia) of Caesarean section deliveries. CONCLUSION: This study is the most comprehensive assessment to date of coverage, equity and quality indicators of delivery care by sector. The private sector provided a substantial proportion of delivery care in low- and middle-income countries. Further research is necessary to better understand this heterogeneous group of providers and their potential to equitably increase the coverage of good-quality intrapartum care.
Authors: Laura Oakley; Lenka Benova; David Macleod; Caroline A Lynch; Oona M R Campbell Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Elizabeth Simmons; Kevin Lane; Sowmya R Rao; Kunal Kurhe; Archana Patel; Patricia L Hibberd Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-08-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gary Joseph; Inácio Crochemore Mohnsam da Silva; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Aluísio J D Barros; Cesar G Victora Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Lenka Benova; David Macleod; Emma Radovich; Caroline A Lynch; Oona M R Campbell Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Lenka Benova; Mardieh L Dennis; Isabelle L Lange; Oona M R Campbell; Peter Waiswa; Manon Haemmerli; Yolanda Fernandez; Kate Kerber; Joy E Lawn; Andreia Costa Santos; Fred Matovu; David Macleod; Catherine Goodman; Loveday Penn-Kekana; Freddie Ssengooba; Caroline A Lynch Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 2.655