Testing the relative influence of instrinsic and extrinsic variation in food availability on feral pig populations in Australia's rangelands.

Instrinsic variation in the availability of food to animal populations reflects the influence of foraging by the animals themselves. Instrinsic variation in food availability provides a link between population density, subsequent food availability and variation in the rate of population increase (r), operating through density-dependent food shortage. In contrast, extrinsic variation in food availability is caused by environmental influences on food or animal abundance, which are independent of animal foraging. Extrinsic variation in food availability is random relative to that arising through intrinsic shortage. Intrinsic and extrinsic variation in food availability can influence animal populations simultaneously. Intrinsic variation will impart a tendency towards an equilibrium between animal and food abundance. which will be progressively obscured by density-independent variation as the influence of extrinsic factors increases. This study used a large-scale field experiment, in which the density of food-limited feral pig (Sus Scrofa L.) populations was manipulated on six sites, to assess the relative influence of intrinsic and extrinsic variation in food availability. The experiment evaluated the influence of pig population density on r and the abundance of food resources measured as pasture biomass. It was predicted that if intrinsic shortages dominated variation in food availability, pasture biomass and r would decline with increasing pig density. If extrinsic factors dominated variation in food availability, pig density would have no systematic effect on either pasture biomass or r. If intrinsic and extrinsic sources simultaneously affected variation in food availability, higher pig densities would have no systematic effect on r, but would reduce pasture biomass. The simultaneous model predicts reduced pasture biomass because, in the absence of compensatory changes in other sources of variation, the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors will be additive. To examine further the degree of interdependence in pig and pasture abundance, a series of stochastic models of the grazing system were estimate and the feedback loop comprising the functional and numerical responses of feral pigs to variation in pasture biomass was manipulated. In the large-scale experiment, neither pasture biomass nor r declined with increasing pig density, suggesting that food availability was dominated by extrinsic factors. However, limitations of the experiment meant that a minor decline in pasture biomass may have gone undetected. Comparison of simulation models, which included and omitted pasture offtake by pigs, indicated that because they were less efficient grazers and persisted at lower average densities relative to other large herbivores, pigs had little influence on variation in pasture biomass.