Erin M Schumer1, Jaimin R Trivedi1, Victor van Berkel1, Matthew C Black1, Mingxiao Li2, Xiao-An Fu2, Michael Bousamra3. 1. Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Ky. 2. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Ky. 3. Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Ky. Electronic address: michael.bousamra@louisville.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Several volatile carbonyl compounds in exhaled breath have been identified as cancer-specific markers. The potential for these markers to serve as a screening test for lung cancer is reported. METHODS: Patients with computed tomography-detected intrathoracic lesions and healthy control participants were enrolled from 2011 onward. One liter of breath was collected from a single exhalation from each participant. The contents were evacuated over a silicon microchip, captured by oximation reaction, and analyzed by mass spectrometry. Concentrations of 2-butanone, 3-hydroxy-2-butanone, 2-hydroxyacetaldehyde, and 4-hydroxyhexanal were measured. The overall population was divided into 3 groups: those with lung cancer, benign disease, and healthy controls. An elevated cancer marker was defined as ≥1.5 SDs above the mean concentration of the control population. One or more elevated cancer markers constituted a positive breath test. RESULTS: In all, 156 subjects had lung cancer, 65 had benign disease, and 194 were healthy controls. A total of 103 (66.0%) lung cancer patients were early stage (stage 0, I, and II). For ≥1 elevated cancer marker, breath analysis showed a sensitivity of 93.6%, and a specificity of 85.6% for lung cancer patients. Additionally, 83.7% of stage I tumors ≤2 cm were detected; whereas only 14% of the control population tested positive. In a comparison of cancer to benign disease, specificity was proportional to the number of elevated cancer markers present. CONCLUSIONS: Screening using a low-dose CT scan is associated with high cost, repeated radiation exposure, and low accrual. The high sensitivity, convenience, and low cost of breath analysis for carbonyl cancer markers suggests that it has the potential to become a primary screening modality for lung cancer.
OBJECTIVE: Several volatile carbonyl compounds in exhaled breath have been identified as cancer-specific markers. The potential for these markers to serve as a screening test for lung cancer is reported. METHODS:Patients with computed tomography-detected intrathoracic lesions and healthy control participants were enrolled from 2011 onward. One liter of breath was collected from a single exhalation from each participant. The contents were evacuated over a silicon microchip, captured by oximation reaction, and analyzed by mass spectrometry. Concentrations of 2-butanone, 3-hydroxy-2-butanone, 2-hydroxyacetaldehyde, and 4-hydroxyhexanal were measured. The overall population was divided into 3 groups: those with lung cancer, benign disease, and healthy controls. An elevated cancer marker was defined as ≥1.5 SDs above the mean concentration of the control population. One or more elevated cancer markers constituted a positive breath test. RESULTS: In all, 156 subjects had lung cancer, 65 had benign disease, and 194 were healthy controls. A total of 103 (66.0%) lung cancerpatients were early stage (stage 0, I, and II). For ≥1 elevated cancer marker, breath analysis showed a sensitivity of 93.6%, and a specificity of 85.6% for lung cancerpatients. Additionally, 83.7% of stage I tumors ≤2 cm were detected; whereas only 14% of the control population tested positive. In a comparison of cancer to benign disease, specificity was proportional to the number of elevated cancer markers present. CONCLUSIONS: Screening using a low-dose CT scan is associated with high cost, repeated radiation exposure, and low accrual. The high sensitivity, convenience, and low cost of breath analysis for carbonyl cancer markers suggests that it has the potential to become a primary screening modality for lung cancer.
Authors: Mumiye A Ogunwale; Ralph J Knipp; Clint N Evrard; Lee M Thompson; Michael H Nantz; Xiao-An Fu Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: Ahmed Shaffie; Ahmed Soliman; Xiao-An Fu; Michael Nantz; Guruprasad Giridharan; Victor van Berkel; Hadil Abu Khalifeh; Mohammed Ghazal; Adel Elmaghraby; Ayman El-Baz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Ekaterina Smirnova; Christopher Mallow; John Muschelli; Yuan Shao; Jeffrey Thiboutot; Andres Lam; Ana M Rule; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Lonny Yarmus Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2022-06
Authors: Erin M Schumer; Matthew C Black; Michael Bousamra; Jaimin R Trivedi; Mingxiao Li; Xiao-An Fu; Victor van Berkel Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 4.330