Literature DB >> 26412253

Provider volume and short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases.

Rafael De la Garza-Ramos1, Nicholas B Abt1, Panagiotis Kerezoudis2, William Krauss2, Mohamad Bydon3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases. Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS; 2003-2009) were extracted. Patients who underwent decompression and/or fusion for metastatic spinal tumors were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Surgeon and hospital volume were evaluated as a continuous variable. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) of in-hospital mortality, post-operative complication development, non-routine discharges, prolonged length of stay, and high hospital charges with increasing surgeon and hospital volume. In total 3,069 admissions were examined. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.4% and in-hospital complication rate 29.7%; non-routine discharges occurred in 63.3% of patients. Increasing provider volume was not associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality. However, increasing surgeon volume was associated with significantly lower odds of developing an in-hospital complication (OR 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.85) and having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.87). Increasing hospital volume was not associated with lower odds of developing a post-operative complication (OR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.00-1.37), but was associated with lower odds of having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95). Patients operated on by higher volume surgeons were less likely to have a prolonged length of stay (over 14 days); higher hospital volume was associated with increased odds of high hospital charges (over $295,511 USD). In this study utilizing the NIS administrative database, patients with metastatic spinal tumors treated by higher volume surgeons had significantly lower complication rates, were more likely to be discharged home following surgery, and were less likely to have a prolonged length of stay. Increasing hospital volume was associated with lower non-routine discharge rates, but with higher hospital charges. Better outcomes with higher volume surgeons may be a reflection of patient selection, and further research is needed to corroborate our findings.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Hospital volume; Nationwide Inpatient Sample; Outcomes; Provider volume; Spinal metastases; Surgeon volume

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26412253     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  6 in total

1.  Intrawound application of vancomycin changes the responsible germ in elective spine surgery without significant effect on the rate of infection: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  B Mirzashahi; M Chehrassan; S M J Mortazavi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-11

2.  Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Tumors in the United States, 2009 to 2011: Effects of Hospital Volume on Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  Daphne Li; Stephen Johans; Brendan Martin; Adrienne Cobb; Miri Kim; Anand V Germanwala
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-01-24

3.  Inpatient morbidity after spinal deformity surgery in patients with movement disorders.

Authors:  Rafael De la Garza Ramos; C Rory Goodwin; Amit Jain; Daniel Martinez-Ramirez; Isaac O Karikari; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

4.  Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes in spine surgery: a dose-response meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Zi Li; Zhong Lin; Zong-Ze Li; Zeng-Yan Yang; Yang Zheng; Yong Li; Hua-Ding Lu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-11

5.  What Is the Value of Undergoing Surgery for Spinal Metastases at Dedicated Cancer Centers?

Authors:  Azeem Tariq Malik; Safdar N Khan; Ryan T Voskuil; John H Alexander; Joseph P Drain; Thomas J Scharschmidt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  The Volume-Outcome Effect: Impact on Trial-to-Permanent Conversion Rates in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Kelly Ryan Murphy; Jing L Han; Syed Mohammed Qasim Hussaini; Siyun Yang; Beth Parente; Jichun Xie; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2016-10-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.