Cornelia Genbrugge1, Jo Dens2, Ingrid Meex1, Willem Boer3, Ward Eertmans1, Marc Sabbe4, Frank Jans1, Cathy De Deyne1. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium. 2. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium; Department of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium. 3. Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium. 4. Emergency Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 375,000 people annually experience sudden cardiac arrest (CA) in Europe. Most patients who survive the initial hours and days after CA die of postanoxic brain damage. Current monitors, such as electrocardiography and end-tidal capnography, provide only indirect information about the condition of the brain during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In contrast, cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy provides continuous, noninvasive, real-time information about brain oxygenation without the need for a pulsatile blood flow. It measures transcutaneous cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (rSO2). This information could supplement currently used monitors. Moreover, an evolution in rSO2 monitoring technology has made it easier to assess rSO2 in CA conditions. OBJECTIVE: We give an overview of the literature regarding rSO2 measurements during CPR and the current commercially available devices. We highlight the feasibility of cerebral saturation measurement during CPR, its role as a quality parameter of CPR, predictor of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and neurologic outcome, and its monitoring function during transport. DISCUSSION: rSO2 is feasible in the setting of CA and has the potential to measure the quality of CPR, predict ROSC and neurologic outcome, and monitor post-CA patients during transport. CONCLUSION: The literature shows that rSO2 has the potential to serve multiple roles as a neuromonitoring tool during CPR and also to guide neuroprotective therapeutic strategies.
BACKGROUND: Approximately 375,000 people annually experience sudden cardiac arrest (CA) in Europe. Most patients who survive the initial hours and days after CA die of postanoxic brain damage. Current monitors, such as electrocardiography and end-tidal capnography, provide only indirect information about the condition of the brain during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In contrast, cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy provides continuous, noninvasive, real-time information about brain oxygenation without the need for a pulsatile blood flow. It measures transcutaneous cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (rSO2). This information could supplement currently used monitors. Moreover, an evolution in rSO2 monitoring technology has made it easier to assess rSO2 in CA conditions. OBJECTIVE: We give an overview of the literature regarding rSO2 measurements during CPR and the current commercially available devices. We highlight the feasibility of cerebral saturation measurement during CPR, its role as a quality parameter of CPR, predictor of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and neurologic outcome, and its monitoring function during transport. DISCUSSION: rSO2 is feasible in the setting of CA and has the potential to measure the quality of CPR, predict ROSC and neurologic outcome, and monitor post-CA patients during transport. CONCLUSION: The literature shows that rSO2 has the potential to serve multiple roles as a neuromonitoring tool during CPR and also to guide neuroprotective therapeutic strategies.
Authors: Melika Hosseini; Robert H Wilson; Christian Crouzet; Arya Amirhekmat; Kevin S Wei; Yama Akbari Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Cesar Reis; Onat Akyol; Camila Araujo; Lei Huang; Budbazar Enkhjargal; Jay Malaguit; Vadim Gospodarev; John H Zhang Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Awni M Al-Subu; Timothy A Hacker; Jens C Eickhoff; George Ofori-Amanfo; Marlowe W Eldridge Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Tiffany S Ko; Constantine D Mavroudis; Ryan W Morgan; Wesley B Baker; Alexandra M Marquez; Timothy W Boorady; Mahima Devarajan; Yuxi Lin; Anna L Roberts; William P Landis; Kobina Mensah-Brown; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton; Arjun G Yodh; Daniel J Licht; Wensheng Guo; Todd J Kilbaugh Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: S Eichhorn; A Mendoza; A Prinzing; A Stroh; L Xinghai; M Polski; M Heller; H Lahm; E Wolf; R Lange; M Krane Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-12-17 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Ole Broch; Lars Hummitzsch; Jochen Renner; Patrick Meybohm; Martin Albrecht; Peter Rosenthal; Ann-Christine Rosenthal; Markus Steinfath; Berthold Bein; Matthias Gruenewald Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 4.379