Literature DB >> 26411593

Clinical Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in the Presence of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder With Squamous or Glandular Differentiation.

Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari1, Einar F Sverrisson1, Pranav Sharma1, Shilpa Gupta1, Michael A Poch1, Julio M Pow-Sang1, Philippe E Spiess1, Wade J Sexton2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We assessed 126 patients with cT1-4, N0-2 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. Twenty patients (16%) had squamous or glandular histological variation (HV). Significant pathologic downstaging (pT<2, N0) was seen in the HV patients (60% vs. 32%; P [ .02) and this difference remained significant after controlling for other clinical and pathological confounders.
BACKGROUND: To assess the pathological response rates and survival outcomes in patients with squamous or glandular histological variation (HV) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and radical cystectomy (RC), and compare these with patients with pure urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (PUCB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with clinical stage T1-4, N0-2 urothelial cancer treated with cisplatin-based nCT and RC in a single institution setting. Patients who received neoadjuvant carboplatin-based regimens were excluded. The primary end point was pathological response. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary end point. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used for multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: We evaluated 126 patients, including 20 (16%) with HV. Median estimated glomerular filtration rate (79.6 vs. 73.6 mL/min; P = .07) and the rate of complete endoscopic resection (75% vs. 40%; P = .01) were higher in the HV patients. Complete pathological response was similar between the groups (21% PUCB vs. 25% HV; P = .77). However, a significantly higher rate of pathologic downstaging (pT<2, N0 [pDS]) was seen in the HV patients (60% vs. 32%; P = .02). In a logistic regression model to predict pDS, in which clinically relevant confounding variables were included, HV (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-13.9) remained an independent predictor of pDS. OS was similar between the 2 groups (HV: 45.7 vs. PUCB: 48.3 months; P = .73).
CONCLUSION: When controlling for confounding factors, improved pDS rates were seen in the HV patients although there were no significant differences in the OS stratified according to histology. These results support the continued use of systemic nCT for this subgroup of patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystectomy carcinoma; Histology; Neoadjuvant therapy; Transitional Cell; Urinary bladder neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26411593     DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  12 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary update on neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Daniel P Nguyen; George N Thalmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Evaluation of the Extent of Variant Histology in Urothelial Carcinoma as a Predictive Marker of Clinical Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Akinori Minato; Hirotsugu Noguchi; Ryosuke Moriya; Katsuyoshi Higashijima; Gosuke Yamasaki; Rieko Kimuro; Yoshitaka Hasegawa; Ikko Tomisaki; Naohiro Fujimoto
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2021-07-03

3.  Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Bladder Carcinomas With Glandular Phenotype.

Authors:  Nima Almassi; Karissa Whiting; Antoun Toubaji; Andrew T Lenis; Emmet J Jordan; Helen Won; Ashley M Regazzi; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Sahussapont J Sirintrapun; Samson W Fine; Satish K Tickoo; Irina Ostrovnaya; Eugene J Pietzak; Eugene K Cha; Alvin C Goh; Timothy F Donahue; Harry W Herr; S Machele Donat; Guido Dalbagni; Bernard H Bochner; Min Yuen Teo; Samuel A Funt; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Victor E Reuter; Dean F Bajorin; David B Solit; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Gopa Iyer
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2022-06

Review 4.  Overview of histologic variants of urothelial carcinoma: current trends and narrative review on treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Olisaemeka Ogbue; Abdo Haddad; Nima Almassi; James Lapinski; Hamed Daw
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-06

Review 5.  Variant Histology in Bladder Cancer-Current Understanding of Pathologic Subtypes.

Authors:  Manju Aron
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Successful Treatment with Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Gemcitabine as Second-line Chemotherapy for Recurrent Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder with Glandular Differentiation After Radical Cystectomy: A Case Report.

Authors:  Hiroki Fukuhara; Hiroshi Kakizaki; Hisashi Kaneko; Takuya Yamanobe; Masaki Ushijima; Yuya Kuboki; Norihiko Tsuchiya
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-08

Review 7.  Patterns and predictors of recurrence after open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrea Mari; Riccardo Campi; Riccardo Tellini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Simone Albisinni; Mohammad Abufaraj; Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Francesco Montorsi; Roland van Velthoven; Marco Carini; Andrea Minervini; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Do histological variants in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder portend poor prognosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qingke Chen; Lei Li; Gongxian Wang; Jieping Hu; Ting Sun; Bin Fu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

9.  Trimodality therapy in variant urothelial carcinoma: choose wisely.

Authors:  Panagiotis J Vlachostergios; Christopher Jakubowski; Scott T Tagawa
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-04

10.  Treatments Outcomes in Histological Variants and Non-Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Nicolas Epaillard; Pauline Parent; Yohann Loriot; Pernelle Lavaud; E-B Vera-Cea; Nieves Martinez-Chanza; Alejo Rodriguez-Vida; Clement Dumont; Rebeca Lozano; Casilda Llácer; Raffaele Ratta; Stephane Oudard; Constance Thibault; Edouard Auclin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.