| Literature DB >> 26411534 |
Zaiwang Zhao1, Yanjuan Sun1, Qian Luo1, Fan Dong1,2, Hui Li1, Wing-Kei Ho3.
Abstract
In the present work, it is very surprising to find that the precursors mass, a long overlooked factor for synthesis of 2D g-C3N4, exerts unexpected impact onEntities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26411534 PMCID: PMC4585959 DOI: 10.1038/srep14643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1XRD pattern of g-C3N4 obtained from different masses of thiourea (a) and enlarged view of (002) peak (b).
Figure 2N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of CN-2T, CN-5T, CN-10T and CN-20T (a) and the corresponding pore-size distribution curves (b).
The SBET, pore volume, peak diameter, band gap value, NO removal ratio and NO2 fraction of g-C3N4 samples as well as that of the references.
| Sample name | Pore volume(cm3/g) | Peak diameter(nm) | Band gap(eV) | NO | NO2 fraction(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN-2 | 66 | 0.39 | 2.7/3.7/30.8 | 2.50 | 48.3 | 20.5 |
| CN-5 | 24 | 0.18 | 3.6/28.4 | 2.46 | 33.6 | 32.3 |
| CN-10 | 13 | 0.087 | 3.6/30.0 | 2.38 | 25.5 | 36.6 |
| CN-20 | 12 | 0.083 | 3.6/32.0 | 2.37 | 12.7 | 44.2 |
| BiOI | 9 | 0.029 | – | 1.77 | 2.5 | – |
| BiOBr | 11 | 0.023 | – | 2.76 | 21.3 | – |
| (BiO)2CO3 | 46 | 0.113 | – | – | 18.6 | – |
| Au/(BiO)2CO3 | 42 | 0.114 | – | – | 33.8 | – |
The data for BiOI, BiOBr, (BiO)2CO3 and Au/(BiO)2CO3 were collected from related references.
Figure 3TEM and magnifying view of pattern of g-C3N4 obtained from different masses of thiourea, (a,b) for CN-20T, (c,d) for CN-10T, (e,f) for CN-5T and (g,h) for CN-2T.
Figure 4The typical AFM image and the corresponding thickness analysis results of g-C3N4 nanosheets obtained for different mass of precursors, (a,b) for CN-20T, (c,d) for CN-10T, (e,f) for CN-5T and (g,h) for CN-2T.
Figure 5XPS spectra of CN-2T, CN-5T, CN-10T and CN-20T samples, survey (a), C1s (b), N1s (c), O1s (d).
Figure 6UV−Vis DRS (a) and plots of (αhν)1/2 versus photon energy (b) of CN-2T, CN-5T, CN-10T and CN-20T.
Figure 7VB XPS (b) of CN-2T, CN-5T, CN-10T and CN-20T.
Figure 8Illustration of the band gap structures of CN-2T, CN-5T, CN-10T and CN-20T.
Figure 9Room temperature PL spectra (Excitation light source:280 nm) of CN-2T, CN-5T, CN-10T and CN-20T.
Figure 10(a–d) Ns-level time-resolved PL spectra monitored at 450 nm under 420 nm excitation at 77 K for (a) CN-2T, (b) CN-5T, (c) CN-10T, and (d) CN-20T.
Kinetics of emission decay parameters of CN-2T, CN-5T, CN-10T and CN-20T.
| Samples | Component | Life time (ns) | RelativePercentage (%) | χ2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN-2T | τ1 | 2.0 | 72.5 | 1.059 |
| τ2 | 10.4 | 27.5 | ||
| CN-5T | τ1 | 1.9 | 74.0 | 1.052 |
| τ2 | 10.1 | 26.0 | ||
| CN-10T | τ1 | 1.9 | 71.5 | 1.044 |
| τ2 | 9.5 | 28.5 | ||
| CN-20T | τ1 | 1.8 | 70.8 | 1.024 |
| τ2 | 9.5 | 29.2 |
Figure 11Photocatalytic activities (a) and apparent rate constants (b) of CN-2T, CN-5T, CN-10T and CN-20T samples for NO degradation in air under visible light illumination (NO concentration: 600 ppb); (c) Monitoring of the fraction of NO2 intermediate over g-C3N4 samples during photocatalytic reaction and (d) stability test of the CN-2T under 5 cycles irradiation with visible light (λ > 420 nm).
Figure 12DMPO spin-trapping ESR spectra of CN-2T in methanol dispersion for •O2− detection and in aqueous dispersion for •OH detection under visible light illumination.