Literature DB >> 26411349

The influence of brace immobilization on the remodeling potential of thoracolumbar impaction fractures in children and adolescents.

Georg Singer1, Stephan Parzer2, Christoph Castellani2, Helmut Wegmann2, Franz Lindbichler3, Holger Till2, Robert Eberl2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Different treatment methods including immediate mobilization with or without brace, bed rest or immobilization using thoracolumbosacral orthosis have been applied for stable compression fractures of the pediatric spine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of bracing on the remodeling capacity of pediatric thoracolumbar type A 1.2 impaction fractures. Additionally, the prevalence of pain and functional disabilities were assessed.
METHODS: All children treated conservatively between 2000 and 2011 with impaction fractures of the thoracolumbar spine (A 1.2) were included and re-invited for a clinical [including VAS 0-100, Oswestry disability index (ODI)] and radiological follow-up examination. Changes of the sagittal index (SI) at the time of the accident, the latest control visit and at the follow-up examination were analyzed.
RESULTS: Seventy-two patients with a mean age of 12 years (1.8-18 years) and a total number of 133 fractured vertebrae were included. The mean SI at the time of injury was 0.76 (range 0.45-0.94, SD 0.08); 34 patients with 67 fractured vertebrae were included in the follow-up examination after a mean of 7.9 years (2.4-13.1 years). The mean SI of the 67 affected vertebrae at follow-up significantly increased to 0.92 (range 0.74-1, SD 0.06). The initial treatment regimen (brace vs no brace) did not influence the remodeling capacity. More than half of the patients (n = 18, 53 %) complained about occasional back-related pain which was not associated with the remodeling process. The mean ODI was 5.8 (range 0-26, SD 6.6) and the mean VAS of the re-evaluated patients was 87 (range 53-100, SD 14).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant remodeling capacity of thoracolumbar vertebral impaction fractures sustained in childhood is demonstrated. Bracing does not seem to influence the long-term outcome of these injuries. More studies have to be performed to define the role of bracing in these fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Impaction fracture; Outcome; Remodeling; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26411349     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4250-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  Use of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating injuries to the pediatric thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  J B Sledge; D Allred; J Hyman
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Vertebral fractures in late adolescence: a 27 to 47-year follow-up.

Authors:  Anders Moller; Ralph Hasserius; Jack Besjakov; Acke Ohlin; Magnus Karlsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Evaluation of fractures in children and adolescents in a Level I Trauma Center in Austria.

Authors:  Johannes Schalamon; Stephan Dampf; Georg Singer; Herwig Ainoedhofer; Thomas Petnehazy; Michael E Hoellwarth; Amulya K Saxena
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-08

Review 4.  Proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Y Lefèvre; P Journeau; A Angelliaume; A Bouty; E Dobremez
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 5.  Thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit: the role for conservative treatment.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  A review of pediatric lumbar spine trauma.

Authors:  Christina Sayama; Tsulee Chen; Gregory Trost; Andrew Jea
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  The clinical presentation of pediatric thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Rafael Santiago; Elisabeth Guenther; Kristen Carroll; Edward P Junkins
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-01

8.  A modeling capacity of vertebral fractures exists during growth: an up-to-47-year follow-up.

Authors:  Magnus K Karlsson; Karlsson K Magnus; Anders Moller; Moller Anders; Ralph Hasserius; Hasserius Ralph; Jack Besjakov; Besjakov Jack; Caroline Karlsson; Karlsson Caroline; Acke Ohlin; Ohlin Acke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Thoracolumbar and sacral spinal injuries in children and adolescents: a review of 89 cases.

Authors:  Seref Dogan; Sam Safavi-Abbasi; Nicholas Theodore; Steven W Chang; Eric M Horn; Nittin R Mariwalla; Harold L Rekate; Volker K H Sonntag
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries.

Authors:  F Magerl; M Aebi; S D Gertzbein; J Harms; S Nazarian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.