Literature DB >> 26410731

Unplanned Hospital Return for Infection following Ureteroscopy-Can We Identify Modifiable Risk Factors?

Rachel A Moses1, Fady M Ghali2, Vernon M Pais2, Elias S Hyams2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Genitourinary infection after ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy is a clinically significant event that may lead to expensive and morbid return to the hospital. We evaluate factors associated with infection after ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy leading to unplanned hospital return.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review evaluating all ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy performed at a single academic institution from April 2011 to August 2014. Data were extracted including patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical encounter characteristics, preoperative urine culture status, antibiotic type/duration and compliance with the AUA Best Practice Statement for antibiotic prophylaxis. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with unplanned return to the hospital.
RESULTS: Among 550 patients undergoing ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy 45% (248) were female with an average age of 56.8 (± 14.8) years. Overall 3.4% (19 patients) had an unplanned return for genitourinary infection, with most (78.9%, 15 of 19) requiring inpatient readmission. Overall compliance with AUA Best Practice Statement for antibiotic prophylaxis was 48.7% (268 of 550). Rates of infection related returns were higher in patients undergoing preoperative stenting (84.2% vs 58.6%, p=0.025), those with an operative time greater than 120 minutes (89.5% vs 32.6% p <0.001) and those for whom there was AUA Best Practice Statement compliance for antibiotic prophylaxis (78.9% vs 47.6%, p=0.007). These factors remained significant on multivariate analysis (p <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative stenting and longer operative time were associated with a greater likelihood of serious genitourinary infection after ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy. These patients may warrant additional antibiotic prophylaxis but further research is needed to answer this question more definitively. Interestingly the AUA Best Practice Statement compliance for antibiotic prophylaxis was also associated with a higher risk of infection, underscoring the need for locally appropriate prophylaxis strategies and further study of optimal prophylaxis regimens.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delivery of health care; infection; patient readmission; ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26410731     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.09.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

Review 1.  To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques.

Authors:  Javier E Santiago; Adam B Hollander; Samit D Soni; Richard E Link; Wesley A Mayer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Antibiotic use and the prevention and management of infectious complications in stone disease.

Authors:  Daniel A Wollin; Adrian D Joyce; Mantu Gupta; Michael Y C Wong; Pilar Laguna; Stavros Gravas; Jorge Gutierrez; Luigi Cormio; Kunjie Wang; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Correlation of Operative Time with Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: a Systematic Review of Literature.

Authors:  Jenni Lane; Lily Whitehurst; B M Zeeshan Hameed; Theodoros Tokas; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Analysis of factors affecting re-admission after retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone.

Authors:  Tae Jin Kim; In Jae Lee; Jung Keun Lee; Hak Min Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Jong Jin Oh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Predictors of Urinary Infections and Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: a Systematic Review from EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS).

Authors:  Shreya Chugh; Amelia Pietropaolo; Emanuele Montanari; Kemal Sarica; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Predictors of urosepsis in struvite stone patients after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Justin Yh Chan; Victor Kf Wong; Julie Wong; Ryan F Paterson; Dirk Lange; Ben H Chew; Kymora B Scotland
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

7.  Should ureteroscopy be performed for patients after ureteral reconstruction with autologous onlay flap/graft?

Authors:  Jie Wang; Shubo Fan; Hua Guan; Shengwei Xiong; Dengxiang Zhang; Bingwei Huang; Xiang Wang; Hongjian Zhu; Zhihua Li; Gengyan Xiong; Zhongyuan Zhang; Kunlin Yang; Xuesong Li; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

Review 8.  Risk of Sepsis in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Mariela Corrales; Alba Sierra; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.