Byung Kook Lee1, Kyoung Hwan Song2, Yong Hun Jung3, Dong Hun Lee4, Chun Sung Youn5, Sung Min Lee6, Yong Soo Cho7, Kyung Woon Jeung8. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: bbukkuk@hanmail.net. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: goodsongkh@hanmail.net. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: xnxn77@hanmail.net. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ggodhkekf@hanmail.net. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ycs1005@catholic.ac.kr. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: magicwizards2@hanmail.net. 7. Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: semi-moon@hanmail.net. 8. Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: neoneti@hanmail.net.
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY: We evaluated the influence of post-rewarming temperature management (PRTM) on post-rewarming fever development and determined the association between the temperature in the immediate post-targeted temperature management (TTM) period and outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included consecutive adult cardiac arrest survivors treated with TTM from January 2008 to December 2013. Beginning in August 2010, our institution implemented a PRTM protocol involving continued use of temperature management device to maintain normothermia during the first 24h after rewarming. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and neurologic outcome at discharge. We evaluated the effect on clinical outcomes of post-rewarming fever defined at a temperature over 38 °C within 48 h after rewarming. RESULTS: Of 277 included patients, 55.2% underwent PRTM. The incidence of post-rewarming fever did not differ between the PRTM and no-PRTM groups (odds ratio [OR] 0.963, confidence interval [CI] 0.519, 1.787). Post-rewarming fever was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (OR 0.243, CI 0.110, 0.534) and decreased rate of unfavorable neurologic outcome (OR 0.312, CI 0.182, 0.534). During 48 h following rewarming, mean temperature was 36.5 °C (36.2-36.8 °C), and peak temperature was 37.5 °C (36.8-38.1 °C). On multivariate analyses, lower mean temperature was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (OR 0.099, CI 0.037, 0.262) and unfavorable neurologic outcome (OR 0.071, CI 0.026, 0.193). CONCLUSION: It appeared that PRTM did not prevent post-rewarming fever development. Post-rewarming fever was associated with favorable outcomes while lower body temperature after rewarming was associated with unfavorable outcomes. Our results require further confirmation by larger prospective studies.
AIM OF THE STUDY: We evaluated the influence of post-rewarming temperature management (PRTM) on post-rewarming fever development and determined the association between the temperature in the immediate post-targeted temperature management (TTM) period and outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included consecutive adult cardiac arrest survivors treated with TTM from January 2008 to December 2013. Beginning in August 2010, our institution implemented a PRTM protocol involving continued use of temperature management device to maintain normothermia during the first 24h after rewarming. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and neurologic outcome at discharge. We evaluated the effect on clinical outcomes of post-rewarming fever defined at a temperature over 38 °C within 48 h after rewarming. RESULTS: Of 277 included patients, 55.2% underwent PRTM. The incidence of post-rewarming fever did not differ between the PRTM and no-PRTM groups (odds ratio [OR] 0.963, confidence interval [CI] 0.519, 1.787). Post-rewarming fever was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (OR 0.243, CI 0.110, 0.534) and decreased rate of unfavorable neurologic outcome (OR 0.312, CI 0.182, 0.534). During 48 h following rewarming, mean temperature was 36.5 °C (36.2-36.8 °C), and peak temperature was 37.5 °C (36.8-38.1 °C). On multivariate analyses, lower mean temperature was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (OR 0.099, CI 0.037, 0.262) and unfavorable neurologic outcome (OR 0.071, CI 0.026, 0.193). CONCLUSION: It appeared that PRTM did not prevent post-rewarming fever development. Post-rewarming fever was associated with favorable outcomes while lower body temperature after rewarming was associated with unfavorable outcomes. Our results require further confirmation by larger prospective studies.
Authors: Hyoung Youn Lee; Dong Hun Lee; Byung Kook Lee; Kyung Woon Jeung; Yong Hun Jung; Seung Phil Choi; Jung Soo Park; Jae Hoon Lee; Kap Su Han; Yong Il Min Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 4.241