Literature DB >> 26409994

Surgical aortic valve replacement outcomes in the transcatheter era.

Elisabeth Martin1, François Dagenais1, Pierre Voisine1, Eric Dumont1, Eric Charbonneau1, Richard Baillot1, Dimitri Kalavrouziotis1, Siamak Mohammadi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in a single high-volume Canadian center.
METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2013, 1593 patients underwent isolated SAVR at our institution. The study period was divided into 2 distinct cohorts of patients undergoing SAVR: before (n = 529) and after (n = 1064) the first TAVI procedure in May 2007. We compared the risk profiles and clinical outcomes of the 2 cohorts and assessed the multivariate predictors of in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: The ratio of isolated SAVR to the total number of cardiac surgery cases per year rose significantly after the introduction of TAVI (7.2% vs 9.1%; P < .0001). There was significantly more diabetes, obesity, recent myocardial infarction, and use of a bioprosthesis among SAVR patients in the post-TAVI era (all P values < .05). In-hospital mortality decreased significantly among SAVR patients following the introduction of TAVI (3.6% vs 1.8%; P = .03). Independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality among the entire study population were SAVR in the pre-TAVI era, baseline creatinine, age, and prosthesis size ≤ 21 mm for the pre-TAVI group only.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of isolated SAVR cases increased following the introduction of TAVI. There was a significant reduction in operative mortality of SAVR in the post-TAVI era despite greater severity of several markers of risk. Patient referrals for TAVI should take into consideration the changing risk profiles and improved results of conventional surgery.
Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve replacement; mortality; risk stratification; transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26409994     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  4 in total

Review 1.  Aortic Regurgitation.

Authors:  Nir Flint; Nina C Wunderlich; Hezzy Shmueli; Sagit Ben-Zekry; Robert J Siegel; Roy Beigel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  National Trends in Utilization and In-Hospital Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacements in Spain, 2001-2015.

Authors:  Rodrigo Jiménez-García; Napoleón Perez-Farinos; Javier de Miguel-Díez; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Manuel Méndez-Bailón; Isabel Jimenez-Trujillo; José M de Miguel-Yanes; Ana López-de-Andrés
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-02-01

3.  Indwelling urinary catheters, aortic valve treatment and delirium: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Leslie Sp Eide; Anette H Ranhoff; Sandra Lauck; Bengt Fridlund; Rune Haaverstad; Karl Ove Hufthammer; Karel K J Kuiper; Jan Erik Nordrehaug; Tone Merete Norekvål
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Early and late outcomes after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in obese patients.

Authors:  Giovanni Mariscalco; Paola D'Errigo; Fausto Biancari; Stefano Rosato; Francesco Musumeci; Marco Barbanti; Marco Ranucci; Gennaro Santoro; Gabriella Badoni; Danilo Fusco; Martina Ventura; Corrado Tamburino; Fulvia Seccareccia
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.318

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.