Literature DB >> 26409670

Sublingual vs. Oral Captopril in Hypertensive Crisis.

Adnan Kaya1, Mustafa Adem Tatlisu1, Tugba Kaplan Kaya2, Ozlem Yildirimturk1, Baris Gungor1, Baran Karatas1, Selcuk Yazici1, Muhammed Keskin1, Sahin Avsar1, Ahmet Murat1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are confusing data in literature regarding oral and sublingual captopril effects over blood pressure (BP) decrease.
OBJECTIVES: In our study we compared oral and sublingual captopril effectiveness over BP decrease in patients admitted to our Emergency Department with hypertensive urgency.
METHODS: Our study was conducted from January 2012 to January 2013 in patients with hypertensive urgency. In this cross-sectional study after two initial BP measurements, patients were identified as eligible for the study. An initial electrocardiogram was obtained and blood samples were drawn. A total of 212 patients were accepted as eligible for the study, and 25 mg of captopril was randomly given orally or sublingually; BP was measured at 10, 30, and 60 min. We selected the patients to the groups consecutively. A 25% reduction of initial BP 1 h after initiation of the treatment was accepted as an accomplishment. A second 25 mg of captopril was given if the target of 25% reduction of BP was not reached after the first tablet. Intravenous drugs were administered to the patients resistant to the captopril and these patients were excluded from the study.
RESULTS: The 10-min systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP, and mean BP (MBP) decrease was more prominent in the sublingual captopril group (p < 0.001). This decrease was statistically significant in the SBP and MBP at 30 min (p < 0.001), and no statistical difference was recorded at 60 min (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In our study, sublingual captopril was found to decrease BP more efficiently in the first 30 min, but this difference equalized at 60 min.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hypertensive urgency; oral captopril; sublingual captopril

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26409670     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  5 in total

1.  Seafood Paramyosins as Sources of Anti-Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme and Anti-Dipeptidyl-Peptidase Peptides after Gastrointestinal Digestion: A Cheminformatic Investigation.

Authors:  Tsun-Thai Chai; Clara Chia-Ci Wong; Mohamad Zulkeflee Sabri; Fai-Chu Wong
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 2.  Therapeutic Approach to Hypertension Urgencies and Emergencies in the Emergency Room.

Authors:  Alessandro Maloberti; Giulio Cassano; Nicolò Capsoni; Silvia Gheda; Gloria Magni; Giulia Maria Azin; Massimo Zacchino; Adriano Rossi; Carlo Campanella; Andrea Luigi Roberto Beretta; Andrea Bellone; Cristina Giannattasio
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2018-05-18

Review 3.  Hypertension Urgencies and Emergencies: The GEAR Project.

Authors:  Massimo Salvetti; Fabio Bertacchini; Giovanni Saccà; Maria Lorenza Muiesan
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2020-03-21

4.  Evaluation of the clinical outcome of captopril use for hypertensive urgency in Khartoum State's emergency centres.

Authors:  Amgad H H Obied; Aimun A E Ahmed
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-11-19

5.  Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertensive Urgency in the Outpatient Setting: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Claudia L Campos; Charles T Herring; Asima N Ali; Deanna N Jones; James L Wofford; Augustus L Caine; Robert L Bloomfield; Janine Tillett; Karen S Oles
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.