Literature DB >> 26409422

A review of automated image understanding within 3D baggage computed tomography security screening.

Andre Mouton1, Toby P Breckon2.   

Abstract

Baggage inspection is the principal safeguard against the transportation of prohibited and potentially dangerous materials at airport security checkpoints. Although traditionally performed by 2D X-ray based scanning, increasingly stringent security regulations have led to a growing demand for more advanced imaging technologies. The role of X-ray Computed Tomography is thus rapidly expanding beyond the traditional materials-based detection of explosives. The development of computer vision and image processing techniques for the automated understanding of 3D baggage-CT imagery is however, complicated by poor image resolutions, image clutter and high levels of noise and artefacts. We discuss the recent and most pertinent advancements and identify topics for future research within the challenging domain of automated image understanding for baggage security screening CT.

Keywords:  Baggage screening; automated image understanding; computer vision; dual-energy computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26409422     DOI: 10.3233/XST-150508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol        ISSN: 0895-3996            Impact factor:   1.535


  3 in total

1.  Feasibility of use of medical dual energy scanner for forensic detection and characterization of explosives, a phantom study.

Authors:  Julien Ognard; David Bourhis; Romain Cadieu; Michel Grenier; Claire Saccardy; Zarrin Alavi; Douraied Ben Salem
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Enhanced detection of threat materials by dark-field x-ray imaging combined with deep neural networks.

Authors:  T Partridge; A Astolfo; S S Shankar; F A Vittoria; M Endrizzi; S Arridge; T Riley-Smith; I G Haig; D Bate; A Olivo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Detecting Bombs in X-Ray Images of Hold Baggage: 2D Versus 3D Imaging.

Authors:  Nicole Hättenschwiler; Marcia Mendes; Adrian Schwaninger
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.888

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.