BACKGROUND: The ability to return to work (RTW) is a significant quality of life indicator for many working aged cancer survivors. In the void of available support, many are left to independently navigate the RTW process which includes such important considerations as disclosure or concealment of diagnosis with concomitant sequellae. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews participants' variable approaches to concealment, disclosure, or even an open educative stance as well as the associated benefits and limitations. METHODS: Photovoice methods combined with interviewing. RESULTS: While most participants disclosed their diagnosis and many extolled the benefits of an open, educative stance, there were drawbacks experienced. Similarly, those who concealed their diagnosis also experienced benefits and challenges. CONCLUSIONS: In the current void of appropriate cancer rehabilitation supports, cancer survivors must independently negotiate their RTW process. Although most participants openly disclosed their diagnosis and associated limitations, a few concealed or camouflaged. There are benefits and limitations to both approaches of which survivors should be made aware at the outset as such will shape their RTW experience. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation support services would best guide survivors' management of the myriad of factors that will impact their work reintegration.
BACKGROUND: The ability to return to work (RTW) is a significant quality of life indicator for many working aged cancer survivors. In the void of available support, many are left to independently navigate the RTW process which includes such important considerations as disclosure or concealment of diagnosis with concomitant sequellae. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews participants' variable approaches to concealment, disclosure, or even an open educative stance as well as the associated benefits and limitations. METHODS: Photovoice methods combined with interviewing. RESULTS: While most participants disclosed their diagnosis and many extolled the benefits of an open, educative stance, there were drawbacks experienced. Similarly, those who concealed their diagnosis also experienced benefits and challenges. CONCLUSIONS: In the current void of appropriate cancer rehabilitation supports, cancer survivors must independently negotiate their RTW process. Although most participants openly disclosed their diagnosis and associated limitations, a few concealed or camouflaged. There are benefits and limitations to both approaches of which survivors should be made aware at the outset as such will shape their RTW experience. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation support services would best guide survivors' management of the myriad of factors that will impact their work reintegration.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer survivorship; disclosure; photovoice; work reintegration