Literature DB >> 26407978

Head CT scan in Iranian minor head injury patients: evaluating current decision rules.

Robab Sadegh1, Ehsan Karimialavijeh2, Farzaneh Shirani3, Pooya Payandemehr4, Hooman Bahramimotlagh5, Mahtab Ramezani6.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to select one of the seven available clinical decision rules for minor head injury, for managing Iranian patients. This was a prospective cohort study evaluating medium- or high-risk minor head injury patients presenting to the Emergency Department. Patients with minor head trauma who were eligible for brain imaging based on seven available clinical decision rules (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS)-II, Neurotraumatology Committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (NCWFNS), New Orleans, American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Guideline, Scandinavian, and Canadian computed tomography (CT) head rule) were selected. Subjects were underwent a non-contrast axial spiral head CT scan. The outcome was defined as abnormal and normal head CT scan. Univariate analysis and stepwise linear regression were applied to show the best combination of risk factors for detecting CT scan abnormalities. Five hundred patients with minor head trauma were underwent brain CT scan. The following criteria were derived by stepwise linear regression: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 15, confusion, signs of basal skull fracture, drug history of warfarin, vomiting more than once, loss of consciousness, focal neurologic deficit, and age over 65 years. This model has 86.15 % (75.33-93.45 %) sensitivity and 46.44 % (46.67-51.25 %) specificity in detecting minor head injury patients with CT scan abnormalities (95 % confidence interval). Of seven decision rules, only the Canadian CT Head Rule possesses seven of the eight high-risk factors associated with abnormal head CT results which were identified by this study. This study underlines the Canadian CT Head Rule's utility in Iranian minor head injury patients. Our study encourages researchers to evaluate available guidelines in different communities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Decision modeling; Head injury

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26407978     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-015-1349-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  31 in total

1.  Head computed tomography use in the emergency department for mild traumatic brain injury: integrating evidence into practice for the resident physician.

Authors:  Melinda J Morton; Frederick K Korley
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Clinical performance of NICE recommendations versus NCWFNS proposal in patients with mild head injury.

Authors:  Andrea Fabbri; Franco Servadei; Giulio Marchesini; Massimo Dente; Tiziana Iervese; Marco Spada; Alberto Vandelli
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Head CT evaluation in clinically stable motor vehicle collision patients.

Authors:  Rahul Gupta; Margaret D Taha; Kathleen McCarroll; Holly Bair; Jinglan Wu
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-07-26

4.  Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; Brian H Rowe; Michael J Schull; Robert Brison; Daniel Cass; Mary A Eisenhauer; R Douglas McKnight; Glen Bandiera; Brian Holroyd; Jacques S Lee; Jonathan Dreyer; James R Worthington; Mark Reardon; Gary Greenberg; Howard Lesiuk; Iain MacPhail; George A Wells
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Predictors of intracranial injury in patients with mild head trauma.

Authors:  P Borczuk
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  A critical comparison of clinical decision instruments for computed tomographic scanning in mild closed traumatic brain injury in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Sherman C Stein; Andrea Fabbri; Franco Servadei; Henry A Glick
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Prediction value of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria for positive head CT scan and acute neurosurgical procedures in minor head trauma: a multicenter external validation study.

Authors:  Wahid Bouida; Soudani Marghli; Sami Souissi; Hichem Ksibi; Mehdi Methammem; Habib Haguiga; Sonia Khedher; Hamdi Boubaker; Kaouthar Beltaief; Mohamed Habib Grissa; Mohamed Naceur Trimech; Wiem Kerkeni; Nawfel Chebili; Imen Halila; Imen Rejeb; Riadh Boukef; Noureddine Rekik; Bechir Bouhaja; Mondher Letaief; Semir Nouira
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Indications for computed tomography in patients with mild head injury.

Authors:  Kenichiro Ono; Kojiro Wada; Takashi Takahara; Toshiki Shirotani
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Prospective validation of a proposal for diagnosis and management of patients attending the emergency department for mild head injury.

Authors:  A Fabbri; F Servadei; G Marchesini; A M Morselli-Labate; M Dente; T Iervese; M Spada; A Vandelli
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults.

Authors:  Aaron Sodickson; Pieter F Baeyens; Katherine P Andriole; Luciano M Prevedello; Richard D Nawfel; Richard Hanson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  Overuse of computed tomography for minor head injury in young patients: an analysis of promoting factors.

Authors:  Michaela Cellina; Marta Panzeri; Chiara Floridi; Carlo Maria Andrea Martinenghi; Giulio Clesceri; Giancarlo Oliva
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Accuracy of Canadian CT Head Rule and New Orleans Criteria for Minor Head Trauma; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Abeer Kadum Abass Alzuhairy
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-09-08

3.  Does distracting pain justify performing brain computed tomography in multiple traumas with mild head injury?

Authors:  Homa Sadeghian; Rouzbeh Motiei-Langroudi
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-03-01

4.  The Applicability of New Orleans Criteria for Head Computed Tomography in Inpatient Falls With Injury.

Authors:  Jay Yarlagadda; Shikha Joshi; Matthew T Cerasale; Sanah Rana; Danielle Heidemann
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2019-03-26

5.  Trends of CT utilisation in an emergency department in Taiwan: a 5-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Sung-Yuan Hu; Ming-Shun Hsieh; Meng-Yu Lin; Chiann-Yi Hsu; Tzu-Chieh Lin; Chorng-Kuang How; Chen-Yu Wang; Jeffrey Che-Hung Tsai; Yu-Hui Wu; Yan-Zin Chang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.