Literature DB >> 26407592

Rumors of the Demise of Peer Review are Premature.

Richard L Kravitz1, Mitchell D Feldman2.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26407592      PMCID: PMC4636549          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3518-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?

Authors:  Catarina Ferreira; Guillaume Bastille-Rousseau; Amanda M Bennett; E Hance Ellington; Christine Terwissen; Cayla Austin; Adrian Borlestean; Melanie R Boudreau; Kevin Chan; Adrian Forsythe; Thomas J Hossie; Kristen Landolt; Jessica Longhi; Josée-Anne Otis; Michael J L Peers; Jason Rae; Jacob Seguin; Cristen Watt; Morgan Wehtje; Dennis L Murray
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2015-04-10

2.  Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Peter Franks; Mitchell D Feldman; Martha Gerrity; Cindy Byrne; William M Tierney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Malathi Srinivasan; Joanna Rea; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.