Awewura Kwara1,2, Anthony Enimil3,4, Fizza S Gillani2, Hongmei Yang5, Anima M Sarfo3, Albert Dompreh3, Antoinette Ortsin3, Lawrence Osei-Tutu3, Sandra Kwarteng Owusu3, Lubbe Wiesner6, Jennifer Norman6, Jaclynn Kurpewski2, Charles A Peloquin7, Daniel Ansong3,4, Sampson Antwi3,4. 1. Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 2. Department of Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. 3. Directorate of Child Health, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana. 4. Department of Child Health, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. 5. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York. 6. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa. 7. College of Pharmacy and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic data on the first-line antituberculosis drugs using the World Health Organization (WHO) revised dosages for children are limited. We investigated the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in children who were mostly treated with revised dosages. METHODS: Children with tuberculosis on first-line therapy for at least 4 weeks had blood samples collected at predose, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours postdose. Drug concentrations were determined by validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry methods, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Factors associated with plasma peak concentration (Cmax) and the area under the time-concentration curve 0-8 hours (AUC0-8h) of each drug was examined using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 62 children, 32 (51.6%) were male, 29 (46.8%) were younger than 5 years old, and 28 (45.2%) had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection. Three patients had undetectable pyrazinamide and ethambutol concentrations. The median (interquartile range) AUC0-8h for isoniazid was 17.7 (10.2-23.4) µg·h mL-1, rifampin was 26.0 (15.3-36.1) µg·h mL-1, pyrazinamide was 144.6 (111.5-201.2) µg·h mL-1, and ethambutol was 6.7 (3.8-10.4) µg·h mL-1. Of the children who received recommended weight-band dosages, 44/51 (86.3%), 46/56 (82.1%), 27/56 (48.2%), and 21/51 (41.2%) achieved target Cmax for isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, and rifampin, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age, sex, HIV coinfection status, and drug dosage in milligrams per kilogram were associated with the drugs' plasma drug Cmax or AUC0-8h. CONCLUSIONS: The revised dosages appeared to be adequate for isoniazid and pyrazinamide, but not for rifampin or ethambutol in this population. Higher dosages of rifampin and ethambutol than currently recommended may be required in most children.
BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic data on the first-line antituberculosis drugs using the World Health Organization (WHO) revised dosages for children are limited. We investigated the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in children who were mostly treated with revised dosages. METHODS:Children with tuberculosis on first-line therapy for at least 4 weeks had blood samples collected at predose, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours postdose. Drug concentrations were determined by validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry methods, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Factors associated with plasma peak concentration (Cmax) and the area under the time-concentration curve 0-8 hours (AUC0-8h) of each drug was examined using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 62 children, 32 (51.6%) were male, 29 (46.8%) were younger than 5 years old, and 28 (45.2%) had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection. Three patients had undetectable pyrazinamide and ethambutol concentrations. The median (interquartile range) AUC0-8h for isoniazid was 17.7 (10.2-23.4) µg·h mL-1, rifampin was 26.0 (15.3-36.1) µg·h mL-1, pyrazinamide was 144.6 (111.5-201.2) µg·h mL-1, and ethambutol was 6.7 (3.8-10.4) µg·h mL-1. Of the children who received recommended weight-band dosages, 44/51 (86.3%), 46/56 (82.1%), 27/56 (48.2%), and 21/51 (41.2%) achieved target Cmax for isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, and rifampin, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age, sex, HIV coinfection status, and drug dosage in milligrams per kilogram were associated with the drugs' plasma drug Cmax or AUC0-8h. CONCLUSIONS: The revised dosages appeared to be adequate for isoniazid and pyrazinamide, but not for rifampin or ethambutol in this population. Higher dosages of rifampin and ethambutol than currently recommended may be required in most children.
Authors: Awewura Kwara; Lei Cao; Hongmei Yang; Pamela Poethke; Jaclynn Kurpewski; Karen T Tashima; Behrang D Mahjoub; Michael H Court; Charles A Peloquin Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Sekai Chideya; Carla A Winston; Charles A Peloquin; William Z Bradford; Philip C Hopewell; Charles D Wells; Arthur L Reingold; Thomas A Kenyon; Themba L Moeti; Jordan W Tappero Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: H Simon Schaaf; Ben J Marais; Andrew Whitelaw; Anneke C Hesseling; Brian Eley; Gregory D Hussey; Peter R Donald Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2007-11-29 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Elizabeth W Tucker; Beatriz Guglieri-Lopez; Alvaro A Ordonez; Brittaney Ritchie; Mariah H Klunk; Richa Sharma; Yong S Chang; Julian Sanchez-Bautista; Sarah Frey; Martin A Lodge; Steven P Rowe; Daniel P Holt; Jogarao V S Gobburu; Charles A Peloquin; William B Mathews; Robert F Dannals; Carlos A Pardo; Sujatha Kannan; Vijay D Ivaturi; Sanjay K Jain Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Museveni Justine; Anita Yeconia; Ingi Nicodemu; Domitila Augustino; Jean Gratz; Estomih Mduma; Scott K Heysell; Sokoine Kivuyo; Sayoki Mfinanga; Charles A Peloquin; Theodore Zagurski; Gibson S Kibiki; Blandina Mmbaga; Eric R Houpt; Tania A Thomas Journal: J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Sampson Antwi; Hongmei Yang; Anthony Enimil; Anima M Sarfo; Fizza S Gillani; Daniel Ansong; Albert Dompreh; Antoinette Orstin; Theresa Opoku; Dennis Bosomtwe; Lubbe Wiesner; Jennifer Norman; Charles A Peloquin; Awewura Kwara Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Roger K Verbeeck; Gunar Günther; Dan Kibuule; Christian Hunter; Tim W Rennie Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: A Bekker; H S Schaaf; H R Draper; L van der Laan; S Murray; L Wiesner; P R Donald; H M McIlleron; A C Hesseling Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Andreas Diacon; Sachiko Miyahara; Rodney Dawson; Xin Sun; Evelyn Hogg; Kathleen Donahue; Michael Urbanowski; Veronique De Jager; Courtney V Fletcher; Richard Hafner; Susan Swindells; William Bishai Journal: Lancet Microbe Date: 2020-06-08