Literature DB >> 26407050

Secondary Caries Development in in situ Gaps next to Composite and Amalgam.

Nicolien K Kuper1, Anelise F Montagner, Françoise H van de Sande, Ewald M Bronkhorst, Niek J M Opdam, Marie-Charlotte D J N M Huysmans.   

Abstract

This in situ study investigated the secondary caries development in dentin in gaps next to composite and amalgam. For 21 days, 14 volunteers wore a modified occlusal splint containing human dentin samples with an average gap of 215 µm (SD=55 µm) restored with three different materials: Filtek Supreme composite, Clearfil AP-X composite and Tytin amalgam. Eight times a day, the splint with samples was dipped in a 20% sucrose solution for 10 min. Before and after caries development, specimens were imaged with transversal wavelength independent microradiography, and lesion depth (LD) and mineral loss (ML) were calculated. The LD and ML of the three restoration materials were compared within patients using paired t tests (α=5%). In total 38 composite samples (Filtek n=19 and AP-X n=19) and 19 amalgam samples could be used for data analysis. AP-X composite presented the highest mean values of LD and ML of the three restorative materials. Amalgam showed statistically significantly less ML (Δ=452 µm×vol%) than the combined composite materials (p=0.036). When comparing amalgam to the separate composite materials, only AP-X composite showed higher ML (Δ=515 µm×vol%) than amalgam (p=0.034). Analysis of LD showed the same trends, but these were not statistically significant. In conclusion, amalgam showed reduced secondary caries progression in dentin in gaps compared to composite materials tested in this in situ model.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26407050     DOI: 10.1159/000438728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  7 in total

Review 1.  Models of Caries Formation around Dental Composite Restorations.

Authors:  J L Ferracane
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Secondary Caries in situ Models: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Audrey C C Hollanders; Nicolien K Kuper; Tamires T Maske; Marie-Charlotte D N J M Huysmans
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Toxic effects of four kinds of dental restorative materials on fibroblast HGF-1 and impacts on expression of Bcl-2 and Bax genes.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wei; Jian Sun; Qinglin Men; Xiaobei Tian
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  In vivo Microbial Diversity Analysis on Different Surfaces of Dental Restorative Materials via 16S rDNA Sequencing.

Authors:  Yan Tu; Yuan Wang; Lingkai Su; Beibei Shao; Zhuhui Duan; Shuli Deng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-07-06

5.  Demineralization prevention with a new antibacterial restorative composite containing QASi nanoparticles: an in situ study.

Authors:  Peter Rechmann; Charles Q Le; Benjamin W Chaffee; Beate M T Rechmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Effect of Polyols and Selected Dental Materials on the Ability to Create a Cariogenic Biofilm-On Children Caries-Associated Streptococcus Mutans Isolates.

Authors:  Małgorzata Staszczyk; Anna Jurczak; Marcin Magacz; Dorota Kościelniak; Iwona Gregorczyk-Maga; Małgorzata Jamka-Kasprzyk; Magdalena Kępisty; Iwona Kołodziej; Magdalena Kukurba-Setkowicz; Wirginia Krzyściak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Low-temperature flow-synthesis-assisted urethane-grafted zinc oxide-based dental composites: physical, mechanical, and antibacterial responses.

Authors:  Jaffar Hussain Bukhari; Abdul Samad Khan; Kashif Ijaz; Shahreen Zahid; Aqif Anwar Chaudhry; Muhammad Kaleem
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.896

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.