| Literature DB >> 26406996 |
Carlos Martí-Gastaldo1,2, John E Warren3,4, Michael E Briggs3, Jayne A Armstrong5, K Mark Thomas5, Matthew J Rosseinsky6.
Abstract
We report two isoreticular 3D peptide-bEntities:
Keywords: metal-organic frameworks; nanoporous materials; peptides; postsynthetic modifications; water adsorption
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26406996 PMCID: PMC4676333 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201502098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemistry ISSN: 0947-6539 Impact factor: 5.236
scheme 1Tripeptides: a) glycyl-l-histidylglycine (GHG,) and b) glycyl-l-histidyl-l-lysine (GHK). Stars represent chiral centres.
Figure 1Structure of as-made Cu(GHG) and Cu(GHK) frameworks. a) Square planar pyramidal geometry of the CuII metal centre. b) Perspective of the binuclear cluster that acts as secondary building unit. The two different types of peptide-to-metal interaction are highlighted: tridentate chelate with the His-X residue (orange) and monodentate carboxylate bond with the C-terminal Gly (green). The dashed line stands for the π-interaction between neighbouring histidine side-chains that contribute to the stabilization and formation of the dimer. c) Perspective showing how the sequence Cu-peptide-Cu defines fourfold helicoidal chains (right) that are bridged into a three-dimensional framework by the formation of μ-carboxylate bridges. Although the pictures correspond to the Cu(GHG) framework these structural details also apply to Cu(GHK). Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. Cu, dark blue; O, red; C, grey; N, blue; H, white.
Torsion angles for the Gly-l-His-Gly and Gly-l-His-l-Lys tripeptides in 1 and 2, respectively.
| Compounds |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 130.8(2) | −178.7(2) | 5.6(3) | |
| 130.3(4) | −173.7(3) | 2.8(5) |
Figure 2View of the three-dimensional porosity in Cu(GHG) (top) and Cu(GHK) (bottom). Surface representation of the 3D porosity (pale green, probe radius 1.2 Å) that results from the interconnection of 1D pores in the open structure of 1 (top) and 2 (bottom). Perspective along [100] (a and c) and [111] (b and d) directions showing the presence 3D channels decorated by a variety of FOS from the peptidic backbone. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.
Figure 3Sponge-like amorphous-to-crystalline structural transformation of Cu(GHG) (left) and Cu(GHK) (right). PXRD patterns of the as-made (a) and desolvated (b) Cu(GHG) (1) and Cu(GHK) (2) (top). PXRD of the solids after exposing the amorphous desolvated structure to the vapours of H2O (c), 50:50 % (v %) mixture of H2O and EtOH (d), EtOH (e) and MeOH (f). See Figures S12–18 in the Supporting Information for the refined unit cell parameters corresponding to the crystalline powder and their comparison with unit cell parameters extracted from single-crystal structures.
Figure 4Water sorption of Cu(GHG) and Cu(GHK). a, b) H2O vapour sorption isotherms for 1 (GHG; a) and 2 (GHK; b); temperature range 26–34 °C. c, d) Variation of apparent isosteric enthalpy of adsorption (c) and entropy of adsorption (d) with the amount of water vapour sorption on 1 and 2 between 26 and 34 °C. The adsorption data for 2 include 20 and 38 °C isotherm data up to 6–7 mmol g−1. e) Variation of entropy of adsorption with isosteric enthalpy of adsorption for water vapour adsorption on 1 and 2.
scheme 2Post-synthetic modification of the GHK tripeptide in 2 to introduce urea groups in the lysine side-chain by treatment with ethyl isocyanate.
Figure 5Structural integrity of Cu(GHK) modified post-synthetically. Comparison of the PXRD patterns for the as-made material (2) and after reaction with ethyl isocyanate (2PSM), confirming that the urea derivatization occurs without significant loss of crystallinity.