Literature DB >> 26405774

Breast cancer screening in Italy: evaluating key performance indicators for time trends and activity volumes.

Livia Giordano1, Roberta Castagno, Daniela Giorgi, Cristiano Piccinelli, Leonardo Ventura, Nereo Segnan, Marco Zappa.   

Abstract

Together with the National centre for screening monitoring (ONS), GISMa supports annual collection of data on national breast screening activities. Aggregated data on implementation and performance are gathered through a standardized form to calculate process and impact indicators. Analyzed data belong to 153 local programmes in the period 2006-2011 (2006-2012 for participation rate only). During the whole period, Italian crude participation rate exceeded GISMa's acceptable standard (50%), even though a higher participation in northern and central Italy compared to southern Italy and Islands was observed. Time trend analysis of diagnostic indicators confirmed in 2011 an adequate quality of breast screening performance, especially at subsequent screening. Recall rate at initial screening did not reach the acceptable standard (<7%) and rose slightly over the period. On the contrary, a good performance was achieved at subsequent screening. The same trend was followed by the overall detection rate and positive predictive value. They both showed a progressive reduction (from 6.2‰ in 2006 to 4.5‰ in 2011 for DR and from 8.0% in 2006 to 5.2% in 2011 for PPV, respectively) at initial screening and a good, stable trend at subsequent screening. Activity volume analysis shows that in programmes with greater activity (test/year ≥10,000) RR at both initial and subsequent screening has a better performance. This is also true for DR and PPV where programmes with high volumes of activity do better, especially when compared with those that interpret fewer than 5,000 mammograms per year. In spite of a few limits, these results are reassuring, and they reward the efforts made by screening professionals. It is therefore important to continue to monitor screening indicators and suggest, test, and evaluate new strategies for continuous improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26405774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Prev        ISSN: 1120-9763            Impact factor:   1.901


  8 in total

1.  Annual mammography at age 45-49 years and biennial mammography at age 50-69 years: comparing performance measures in an organised screening setting.

Authors:  Lauro Bucchi; Alessandra Ravaioli; Flavia Baldacchini; Orietta Giuliani; Silvia Mancini; Rosa Vattiato; Fabio Falcini; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Cinzia Campari; Debora Canuti; Enza Di Felice; Priscilla Sassoli de Bianchi; Stefano Ferretti; Nicoletta Bertozzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Mammography self-evaluation online test for screening readers: an Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) initiative.

Authors:  Beniamino Brancato; Francesca Peruzzi; Calogero Saieva; Simone Schiaffino; Sandra Catarzi; Gabriella Gemma Risso; Andrea Cozzi; Serena Carriero; Massimo Calabrese; Stefania Montemezzi; Chiara Zuiani; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening indicators in a Spanish population-based program: a cohort study.

Authors:  Guillermo Bosch; Margarita Posso; Javier Louro; Marta Roman; Miquel Porta; Xavier Castells; Francesc Macià
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 4.  Breast Cancer Screening Programmes across the WHO European Region: Differences among Countries Based on National Income Level.

Authors:  Emma Altobelli; Leonardo Rapacchietta; Paolo Matteo Angeletti; Luca Barbante; Filippo Valerio Profeta; Roberto Fagnano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Why the Gold Standard Approach by Mammography Demands Extension by Multiomics? Application of Liquid Biopsy miRNA Profiles to Breast Cancer Disease Management.

Authors:  Pavol Zubor; Peter Kubatka; Karol Kajo; Zuzana Dankova; Hubert Polacek; Tibor Bielik; Erik Kudela; Marek Samec; Alena Liskova; Dominika Vlcakova; Tatiana Kulkovska; Igor Stastny; Veronika Holubekova; Jan Bujnak; Zuzana Laucekova; Dietrich Büsselberg; Mariusz Adamek; Walther Kuhn; Jan Danko; Olga Golubnitschaja
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Effectiveness of a small breast screening programme: 25 year evaluation (25 year breast screening evaluation).

Authors:  Andrew Patric Nisbet; Andrew Borthwick-Clarke; Nic Scott; Helen Goulding; Harwood Jane
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-07-13

7.  Subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program after a false-positive result in the Local Health Authority of Bologna (Italy).

Authors:  Lorena Squillace; Lorenzo Pizzi; Flavia Rallo; Carmen Bazzani; Gianni Saguatti; Francesca Mezzetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Geographic Inequalities in Breast Cancer in Italy: Trend Analysis of Mortality and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Olivera Djuric; Simone Navarra; Alessandra Rossi; Anteo Di Napoli; Luisa Frova; Alessio Petrelli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.