| Literature DB >> 26405583 |
Travis E Grotz1, James W Jakub1, Aaron S Mansfield2, Rachel Goldenstein3, Elizabeth Ann L Enninga3, Wendy K Nevala2, Alexey A Leontovich4, Svetomir N Markovic3.
Abstract
Melanoma has a propensity for lymphatogenous metastasis. Improved understanding of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) immunological environment may improve outcomes. The immune phenotype of fresh melanoma SLNs (n = 13) were compared to fresh control lymph nodes (n = 13) using flow cytometry. RNA was isolated from CD4+ T cells of the SLN and control lymph node and assessed for Th1/Th2 gene expression pathways using qRT-PCR. In addition, VEGF expression was compared between primary melanoma (n = 6) and benign nevi (n = 6) using immunohistochemistry. Melanoma SLNs had fewer CD8+ T cells compared to controls (9.2% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.0005). The CD8+ T cells within the SLN appeared to have an exhausted phenotype demonstrated by increased PD-1 mRNA expression (2.2% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.004) and a five-fold increase in CTLA-4 mRNA expression. The SLN also contained an increased number of CD14 (22.7% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.009) and CD68 (9.3% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.001) macrophages, and CD20 B cells (31.1% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.008), suggesting chronic inflammation. RT-PCR demonstrated a significant Th2 bias within the SLN. In vitro studies demonstrated a similar Th2 polarization with VEGF treatment of control lymph nodes. The primary melanoma demonstrated strong VEGF expression and an increase in VEGFR1 within the SLN. Melanoma is associated with Th2-mediated "chronic inflammation," fewer cytotoxic T cells, and an exhausted T cell phenotype within the SLN combined with VEGF overproduction by the primary melanoma. These immunologic changes precede nodal metastasis and suggests consideration of VEGF inhibitors in future immunotherapy studies.Entities:
Keywords: CD4 T cells; CD8 T cells; Th2 polarization; VEGF; immunotherapy; inflammation; lymphocytes; melanoma; sentinel lymph node
Year: 2015 PMID: 26405583 PMCID: PMC4570120 DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1026504
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncoimmunology ISSN: 2162-4011 Impact factor: 8.110
Clinical and pathological characteristics of the thirteen patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma and the thirteen control patients undergoing prophylactic mastectomy (median and IQR or number and frequency are reported)
| Characteristics | Melanoma ( | Breast ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 61 (45–65) | 43 (38–59) | 0.2 |
| Sex | |||
| 8 (62%) | 0 (0%) | <0.001 | |
| 5 (38%) | 13 (100%) | ||
| Location | |||
| 11 (85%) | 16 (100%) | 0.33 | |
| 2 (15%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Breslow depth | 1.2 (0.9–2.7) | NA | |
| Ulceraton | 2 (15%) | ||
| TIL response | NA | ||
| 1 (8%) | |||
| 11 (85%) | |||
| 1 (8%) | |||
| SLN status | NA | ||
| 4 (31%) | |||
| 9 (69%) |
Figure 1.Artist depiction of technique for obtaining fresh nodal tissue from the sentinel lymph node for immunological analysis without compromising pathological analysis. The surrounding fat is removed from the sentinel lymph node and the node is sectioned into 2 mm gross sections. Each section is placed on a cryotome and a single shaving is removed from the top prior to freezing. This tissue is collected for immunological profiling. The remainder of the 2 mm section is then utilized for pathological analysis. On average there were four 2 mm sections processed resulting in four shavings from throughout the sentinel lymph node.
Melanoma SLN CD4+ T helper cell gene expression of particular interest to Th1 and Th2 function
| Gene name | Fold change | Function | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-13R | 20.28 | Receptor for IL-13 | ||
| TGFB3 | 15.33 | Inhibitory cytokine produced by regulatory T cells | ||
| STAT6 | 10.94 | Downstream mediator of IL-4 signaling | ||
| STAT4 | 9.43 | Th1 signaling | ||
| TNF | 7.48 | Chronic exposure impairs T cell activation | ||
| CCR4 | 6.36 | Preferentially expressed by Th2 cells | ||
| CCR2 | 6.17 | Chemokine for monocyte infiltration | ||
| IL-13 | 4.93 | Th2 cytokine | ||
| IL-6R | 4.66 | Th2 cytokine | ||
| CD40LG | 4.26 | Co-stimulatory and regulates B cell function | ||
| IL-17A | 3.83 | Chronic inflammatory cytokine | ||
| CREBBP | 3.79 | Th2 transcription factor | ||
| NFATC1 | 3.64 | Th2 transcription factor | ||
| CCR5 | 3.55 | Potentiates interaction between T cell and APC | ||
| NFATC2 | 3.43 | Th2 transcription factor | ||
| CSF2 | 3.32 | Stimulates granulocytes and monocytes | ||
| IL-4 | 3.05 | Th2 cytokine | ||
| CCL5 | 0.12 | Migration of Th1 T cells | ||
| SOCS2 | 0.13 | negative regulator of Th2 polarity | ||
| TLR6 | 0.18 | Drives Th1 response | ||
| IL-12B | 0.19 | Th1 cytokine | ||
| IRF4 | 0.21 | maintains Th1 polarity | ||
| IFNγ | 0.27 | Th1 cytokine | ||
| SOCS1 | 0.29 | maintains Th1 polarity | ||
| CD4 | 0.31 | T helper cell expression | ||
Immune cell phenotype of the control lymph node, non-SLN and SLN. Mean and standard deviation is reported. Due to multiple comparisons only a p-value ≤ 0.008 is considered statistically significant (Bonferroni correction).
| Immune cell type | Control LN | Non-SLN | SLN | Control vs. Non-SLN | Non-SLN vs. SLN | Control vs. SLN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3+ CD8+ (effector T cell) | 19.51 ± 7.36 | 15.74 ± 7.93 | 9.22 ± 4.98 | ns | 0.005 | 0.0005 |
| CD3+ CD62L+ (naive T cell) | 9.19 ± 10.52 | 26.82 ± 23.27 | 32.42 ± 15.43 | ns | ns | 0.0002 |
| CD3+ CD69+ (activated T cell) | 16.86 ± 13.38 | 17.63 ± 7.38 | 17.21 ± 10.72 | ns | ns | ns |
| CD3+ CD152 (CTLA-4) | 7.62 ± 5.90 | 7.38 ± 5.51 | 7.79 ± 3.32 | ns | ns | ns |
| CD3+ CD279 (PD-1) | 0.78 ± 0.93 | 2.25 ± 1.31 | 2.20 ± 1.13 | 0.005 | ns | 0.004 |
| CD11c+ CD86+ (mature dendritic cell) | 9.74 ± 8.70 | 7.59 ± 7.82 | 8.01 ± 6.29 | ns | ns | ns |
| CD141+ CD86+ (myeloid dendritic cell) | 23.91 ± 12.32 | 13.32 ± 15.78 | 15.02 ± 6.01 | ns | ns | ns |
| CD123+ (plasmacytoid dendritic cell) | 6.62 ± 8.79 | 3.49 ± 2.74 | 14.74 ± 18.35 | ns | ns | ns |
| CD20+ (B cell) | 20.73 ± 2.76 | 27.63 ± 2.85 | 31.14 ± 5.40 | s | ns | 0.008 |
| CD14+ (Macrophage) | 7.72 ± 5.56 | 12.69 ± 10.09 | 22.66 ± 18.70 | ns | ns | 0.009 |
| CD68+ (macrophage) | 2.70 ± 1.79 | 5.12 ± 3.58 | 9.26 ± 6.79 | ns | ns | 0.001 |
| CD4+ CD25+ FOXp3+ (Treg) | 25.38 ± 13.04 | 51.12 ± 26.39 | 35.1 ± 20.97 | 0.007 | ns | ns |
Figure 2.(A) Box-plot illustrating the difference in median percentage of CD3+ CD8+ T cells. (B) Box-plot demonstrating differences in median percentage of CD3+ CD4+ and CD3+ and CD8+ T cells. (C) Box-plot demonstrating differences in median CD3+ CD62L+ cells (Controls n = 13, non-SLN n = 9 and melanoma SLN n = 13). (D) Box-plot illustrating differences in median percentage of CTLA-4 and PD-1 expression.
Figure 3.Histogram demonstrating the functional enrichment z scores of Th1/Th2 pathways within CD4+ T cells of SLN draining melanoma compared to control LNs, respectively (n = 4) on the left and CD4+ T cells of control lymph nodes treated with VEGF compared to untreated control lymph nodes on the right (n = 3).
Figure 4.Representative immunohistochemistry slides (5x) stained with anti-VEGF antibody from (A) benign nevi with no VEGF staining and (B) melanoma with diffuse cytoplasmic staining. (C) Histogram comparing VEGF receptor expression within melanoma SLN and control lymph nodes.