N E Essomba1, D C Kedy Koum2, D Adiogo2, M I Ngwe3, Y Coppieters4. 1. Department of Public Health, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon. 2. Department of Paediatrics, Univeristy of Douala, Douala, Cameroon. 3. Department of Pharmacy, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon. 4. School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The use of oral rehydration solutions in our context remains limited. This study was conducted to analyze the rate of this use in Douala, Cameroon and thereby determine the factors associated with it. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was administered to parents of children aged five years and younger during a six-month study period. The studied variables focused on the socio-demographic data of the population, data on diarrhoea and its severity, data on oral rehydration salts (ORS), and data related to other interventions for diarrhoea. The chi-square test was used to qualify associations between variables, with the significance level being set at 5%. RESULTS: Overall, 672 people agreed to participate in the study. Among them, 418 (62.2%) correctly defined diarrhoea. When their children develop diarrhoea, the majority of the parents (348, 51.8%) reported seeking hospital assistance before any intervention, while 225 parents (33.5%) preferred the use of ORS first. Four hundred seventy-five parents (70.7%) had heard of ORS and among them 313 (65.9%) had actually given ORS to their children as treatment during these children's most recent episodes of diarrhoea. Of the parents who had given their children ORS, 217 (69.3%) knew how to prepare it, and 122 (39.0%) knew how to administer it. One hundred thirty-five parents (20.1%) had administered metronidazole to treat their children's diarrhoea. The age of the children, the parents' level of education, and the number of children in the household significantly influenced the use or non-use of ORS (respectively, p < 0.001, p = 0.003 and p < 0.0001). Rehydration was correctly identified by 234 parents (34.8%) as the purpose of administering ORS. CONCLUSION: The knowledge and the use of ORS in diarrhoea by the study sample was insufficient. The role of ORS was poorly known. Awareness campaigns can be carried out in order to improve the use of this effective intervention for diarrhoea.
INTRODUCTION: The use of oral rehydration solutions in our context remains limited. This study was conducted to analyze the rate of this use in Douala, Cameroon and thereby determine the factors associated with it. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was administered to parents of children aged five years and younger during a six-month study period. The studied variables focused on the socio-demographic data of the population, data on diarrhoea and its severity, data on oral rehydration salts (ORS), and data related to other interventions for diarrhoea. The chi-square test was used to qualify associations between variables, with the significance level being set at 5%. RESULTS: Overall, 672 people agreed to participate in the study. Among them, 418 (62.2%) correctly defined diarrhoea. When their children develop diarrhoea, the majority of the parents (348, 51.8%) reported seeking hospital assistance before any intervention, while 225 parents (33.5%) preferred the use of ORS first. Four hundred seventy-five parents (70.7%) had heard of ORS and among them 313 (65.9%) had actually given ORS to their children as treatment during these children's most recent episodes of diarrhoea. Of the parents who had given their childrenORS, 217 (69.3%) knew how to prepare it, and 122 (39.0%) knew how to administer it. One hundred thirty-five parents (20.1%) had administered metronidazole to treat their children's diarrhoea. The age of the children, the parents' level of education, and the number of children in the household significantly influenced the use or non-use of ORS (respectively, p < 0.001, p = 0.003 and p < 0.0001). Rehydration was correctly identified by 234 parents (34.8%) as the purpose of administering ORS. CONCLUSION: The knowledge and the use of ORS in diarrhoea by the study sample was insufficient. The role of ORS was poorly known. Awareness campaigns can be carried out in order to improve the use of this effective intervention for diarrhoea.
Authors: Christine K Olson; Lauren S Blum; Kinnery N Patel; Prisca A Oria; Daniel R Feikin; Kayla F Laserson; Annah W Wamae; Alfred V Bartlett; Robert F Breiman; Pavani K Ram Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Abdullah H Baqui; Robert E Black; Shams El Arifeen; Mohammad Yunus; K Zaman; Nazma Begum; Amira A Roess; Mathuram Santosham Journal: J Health Popul Nutr Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Helena Ferraz Bühler; Eliane Ignotti; Sandra Mara Alves da Silva Neves; Sandra de Souza Hacon Journal: Cad Saude Publica Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 1.632
Authors: Mathuram Santosham; Aruna Chandran; Sean Fitzwater; Christa Fischer-Walker; Abdullah H Baqui; Robert Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-07-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Hendra Salim; I Putu Gede Karyana; I Gusti Ngurah Sanjaya-Putra; Soetjiningsih Budiarsa; Yati Soenarto Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2014-03-26 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Adam C Levine; Richard M Munyaneza; Justin Glavis-Bloom; Vanessa Redditt; Hannah C Cockrell; Bantu Kalimba; Valentin Kabemba; Juvenal Musavuli; Mathias Gakwerere; Jean Paul de Charles Umurungi; Sachita P Shah; Peter C Drobac Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 3.240