Literature DB >> 26404952

Differences in Colonoscopy Quality Among Facilities: Development of a Post-Colonoscopy Risk-Standardized Rate of Unplanned Hospital Visits.

Isuru Ranasinghe1, Craig S Parzynski1, Rana Searfoss1, Julia Montague1, Zhenqiu Lin1, John Allen2, Ronald Vender2, Kanchana Bhat1, Joseph S Ross3, Susannah Bernheim4, Harlan M Krumholz5, Elizabeth E Drye6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopy is a common procedure, yet little is known about variations in colonoscopy quality among outpatient facilities. We developed an outcome measure to profile outpatient facilities by estimating risk-standardized rates of unplanned hospital visits within 7 days of colonoscopy.
METHODS: We used a 20% sample of 2010 Medicare outpatient colonoscopy claims (331,880 colonoscopies performed at 8140 facilities) from patients ≥65 years or older, and developed a patient-level logistic regression model to estimate the risk of unplanned hospital visits (ie, emergency department visits, observation stays, and inpatient admissions) within 7 days of colonoscopy. We then used the patient-level risk model variables and hierarchical logistic regression to estimate facility rates of risk-standardized unplanned hospital visits using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (325,811 colonoscopies at 992 facilities), from 4 states containing 100% of colonoscopies per facility.
RESULTS: Outpatient colonoscopies were followed by 5412 unplanned hospital visits within 7 days (16.3/1000 colonoscopies). Hemorrhage, abdominal pain, and perforation were the most common causes of unplanned hospital visits. Fifteen variables were independently associated with unplanned hospital visits (c = 0.67). A history of fluid and electrolyte imbalance (odds ratio [OR] = 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-1.58), psychiatric disorders (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.22-1.46), and, in the absence of prior arrhythmia, increasing age past 65 years (aged >85 years vs 65-69 years: OR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.54-2.28) were most strongly associated. The facility risk-standardized unplanned hospital visits calculated using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data showed significant variation (median 12.3/1000; 5th-95th percentile, 10.5-14.6/1000). Median risk-standardized unplanned hospital visits were comparable between ambulatory surgery centers and hospital outpatient departments (each was 10.2/1000), and ranged from 16.1/1000 in the Northeast to 17.2/1000 in the Midwest.
CONCLUSIONS: We calculated a risk-adjusted measure of outpatient colonoscopy quality, which shows important variation in quality among outpatient facilities. This measure can make transparent the extent to which patients require follow-up hospital care, help inform patient choices, and assist in quality-improvement efforts.
Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Admission; Endoscopy; Health Policy; Outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26404952     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  15 in total

1.  Quality in Endoscopy: It's Time for an Audit!

Authors:  Pedro Cardoso Figueiredo
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-12

2.  Comparison of the efficiency of colorectal cancer screening programs based on age and genetic risk for reduction of colorectal cancer mortality.

Authors:  Oliver Stanesby; Mark Jenkins
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Emerging stool-based and blood-based non-invasive DNA tests for colorectal cancer screening: the importance of cancer prevention in addition to cancer detection.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-08

4.  Unplanned Hospital Encounters After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in 3 Large North American States.

Authors:  Robert J Huang; Monique T Barakat; Mohit Girotra; Jennifer S Lee; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Institutional Variation in 30-Day Complications Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Linh Ngo; Anna Ali; Anand Ganesan; Richard Woodman; Harlan M Krumholz; Robert Adams; Isuru Ranasinghe
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 6.  Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Jin Young Yoon; Jae Myung Cha; Yoon Tae Jeen
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2018-01-18

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer screening: An updated review of the available options.

Authors:  Iyad A Issa; Malak Noureddine
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia: A modelling study of the costs, benefits, and harms of different participation scenarios.

Authors:  Mary Dillon; Louisa Flander; Daniel D Buchanan; Finlay A Macrae; Jon D Emery; Ingrid M Winship; Alex Boussioutas; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Driss Ait Ouakrim
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 9.  Quality is the Key for Emerging Issues of Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening.

Authors:  Jin Young Yoon; Jae Myung Cha; Yoon Tae Jeen
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-01-31

10.  Economic analysis of the adoption of capsule endoscopy within the British NHS.

Authors:  Alan Lobo; Rafael Torrejon Torres; Mark McAlindon; Simon Panter; Catherine Leonard; Nancy van Lent; Rhodri Saunders
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.